Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona National Federation of Independent Business

1999-2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Ken Bennett 100%
AZ State House 25 Rusty Bowers Republican 100%
Lori Daniels 100%
Franklin Flake 100%
Darden Hamilton 100%
John Huppenthal 100%
Marc Spitzer 100%
Robert Burns 91%
Jean McGrath 91%
Roberta Voss 91%
Michael Gardner 89%
Keith Bee 83%
Scott Bundgaard 83%
Brenda Burns 83%
Edward Cirillo 83%
Sue Grace 83%
Barbara Blewster 82%
Dean Cooley 82%
Joe Hart 82%
Marilyn Jarrett 82%
Barbara Leff 82%
Wesley Marsh 82%
W. A. McGibbon 82%
AZ State Senate 14 Gail Griffin Republican 80%
Jeff Hatch-Miller 80%
Laura Knaperek 80%
Barry Wong 80%
Steve May 78%
Thomas Gordon 75%
Debra Brimhall 73%
Kathleen Dunbar 73%
Lowell Gleason 73%
Linda Gray 73%
Jeff Groscost 73%
Tom Horne 73%
Karen Johnson 73%
Jerry Overton 73%
Lou-Ann Preble 73%
Jim Weiers 73%
Mark Anderson 70%
Dan Schottel 70%
Gus Arzberger 67%
Tom Freestone 67%
David Petersen 67%
Tom Smith 67%
Ruth Solomon 67%
Wayne Gardner 64%
Ken Cheuvront 60%
Ted Carpenter 55%
Linda Aguirre 50%
Linda Binder 50%
Jack Brown 50%
Chris Cummiskey 50%
George Cunningham 50%
Ann Day 50%
Randall Gnant 50%
Herb Guenther 50%
Steve Huffman 50%
Harry Mitchell 50%
Elaine Richardson 50%
Victor Soltero 50%
John Wettaw 50%
James Carruthers 45%
Carolyn Allen 44%
Christine Weason 43%
Susan Gerard 40%
Mark Maiorana 40%
Andy Nichols 40%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 40%
William Brotherton 36%
Debora Norris 30%
Carlos Avelar II 27%
Sylvia Laughter 27%
Marion Pickens 27%
John Verkamp 27%
Carmine Cardamone 20%
Herschella Horton 20%
Leah Landrum Taylor 20%
John Loredo 18%
Mary Hartley 17%
Joe Eddie Lopez 17%
Harry Clark 10%
Ramon Valadez 10%
Kathi Foster 9%
AZ State House 3 Sally Ann Gonzales Democratic 9%
Robert McLendon 9%
AZ State House 27 Rebecca Rios Democratic 9%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top