Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NumbersUSA

2005-2006 Positions

Issues: Immigration
State Office District Name Party Rating
Jon Porter, Sr. 75%
Tom Price 83%
Deborah Pryce 76%
Mark Pryor 27%
Adam Putnam 72%
George Radanovich 44%
Nick Rahall II 28%
James Ramstad 79%
Charlie Rangel 6%
Ralph Regula 48%
Denny Rehberg 86%
Harry Reid 21%
Richard Renzi 83%
Silvestre Reyes 26%
Thomas Reynolds 66%
Jay Rockefeller IV 81%
Mike Rogers 89%
Mike Ross 66%
Steve Rothman 25%
John Salazar 44%
Ken Salazar 25%
Loretta Sanchez 32%
Jim Saxton 76%
Jean Schmidt 89%
Allyson Schwartz 33%
Jeff Sessions III 94%
John Shadegg 79%
Christopher Shays 94%
Ike Skelton 87%
Louise Slaughter 25%
Gordon Smith 16%
Olympia Snowe 29%
Vic Snyder 20%
Mark Souder 54%
Arlen Specter 16%
John Spratt, Jr. 51%
Pete Stark 22%
Cliff Stearns 89%
Ted Stevens 16%
Bart Stupak 37%
John Sullivan 89%
John Sununu 75%
Tom Tancredo 94%
John Tanner 89%
Ellen Tauscher 25%
Gene Taylor 89%
Lee Terry 63%
Craig Thomas 52%
Todd Tiahrt 56%
Pat Tiberi 70%
John Tierney 27%
Ed Towns 7%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 25%
Mark Udall 57%
David Vitter 94%
George Voinovich 16%
James Walsh 46%
Zach Wamp 93%
John Warner 22%
Diane Watson 20%
Mel Watt 19%
Henry Waxman 33%
Anthony Weiner 24%
David Weldon 82%
Gerald Weller 84%
Lynn Westmoreland 91%
Robert Wexler 23%
Ed Whitfield 94%
Heather Wilson 21%
Frank Wolf 88%
Lynn Woolsey 26%
David Wu 22%
Albert Wynn 19%
Bill Young 79%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top