Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NumbersUSA

2003-2005 Positions

Issues: Immigration
State Office District Name Party Rating
Jon Porter, Sr. 31%
Deborah Pryce 62%
Mark Pryor 8%
Adam Putnam 46%
George Radanovich 54%
Nick Rahall II 23%
James Ramstad 69%
Charlie Rangel 0%
Ralph Regula 62%
Denny Rehberg 54%
Harry Reid 31%
Richard Renzi 46%
Silvestre Reyes 8%
Thomas Reynolds 54%
Jay Rockefeller IV 23%
Mike Rogers 69%
Dana Rohrabacher 100%
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen 23%
Mike Ross 38%
Steve Rothman 23%
Ed Royce 69%
Paul Ryan 46%
Jim Ryun 69%
Martin Olav Sabo 23%
Loretta Sanchez 8%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 23%
Jim Saxton 69%
Jeff Sessions III 69%
Pete Sessions 69%
John Shadegg 92%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 77%
Christopher Shays 46%
Donald Sherwood 54%
Bill Shuster 69%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 23%
Ike Skelton 8%
Louise Slaughter 23%
Gordon Smith 0%
Lamar Smith 92%
Olympia Snowe 0%
Vic Snyder 0%
Mark Souder 31%
Arlen Specter 15%
John Spratt, Jr. 46%
Pete Stark 23%
Cliff Stearns 69%
Ted Stevens 0%
Ted Strickland 31%
Bart Stupak 8%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 62%
James Talent 0%
Tom Tancredo 100%
John Tanner 38%
Ellen Tauscher 0%
Charles Taylor 100%
Gene Taylor 85%
Lee Terry 62%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 69%
Todd Tiahrt 46%
Pat Tiberi 62%
John Tierney 23%
Ed Towns 8%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 23%
Mark Udall 15%
David Vitter 69%
George Voinovich 0%
James Walsh 31%
Zach Wamp 77%
John Warner 0%
Mel Watt 23%
Henry Waxman 0%
Anthony Weiner 0%
David Weldon 69%
W. Curtis Weldon 46%
Gerald Weller 38%
Robert Wexler 23%
Ed Whitfield 69%
Heather Wilson 8%
Frank Wolf 46%
Lynn Woolsey 8%
David Wu 15%
Albert Wynn 23%
Bill Young 69%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top