Rating Group: Wisconsin Voters for Companion Animals

2009-2010 Positions on Animal Protection

State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 100
WI U.S. House-6 Glenn Grothman R 13
WI State Assembly-6 Gary Tauchen R 10
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 90
WI State Assembly-11 Jason Fields D 70
WI State Assembly-12 Frederick Kessler D 30
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 50
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 100
WI State Assembly-23 Jim Ott R 50
WI State Assembly-24 Dan Knodl R 10
WI State Assembly-36 Jeffrey Mursau R 20
WI State Assembly-38 Joel Kleefisch R 10
WI State Assembly-40 Kevin Petersen R 20
WI State Assembly-41 Joan Ballweg R 20
WI State Assembly-42 Keith Ripp R 20
WI State Assembly-46 Gary Hebl D 70
WI State Assembly-50 Ed Brooks R 40
WI State Assembly-54 Gordon Hintz D 50
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 20
WI State Assembly-63 Robin Vos R 20
WI State Assembly-64 Peter Barca D 50
WI State Assembly-66 Cory Mason D 70
WI State Assembly-73 Nick Milroy D 100
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 100
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 90
WI State Assembly-89 John Nygren R 20
WI State Assembly-96 Lee Nerison R 20
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 38
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 100
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 63
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 10
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 100
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 13
WI State Senate-11 Stephen Nass R 20
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 63
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 38
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 63
WI State Senate-19 Roger Roth, Jr. R 10
WI State Senate-22 Bob Wirch D 38
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 100
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 38
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 20
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 100
WI State Senate-31 Kathleen Vinehout D 13
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 50
WI Supervisor-17 Tony Staskunas 50
Chuck Benedict 90
Penny Bernard Schaber 50
Garey Bies 60
Spencer Black 70
Fred Clark 30
G. Spencer Coggs 38
Pedro Colon 50
David Cullen 50
Chris Danou 30
Brett Davis 30
Russell Decker 13
Kristen Dexter 50
Michael Ellis 13
Jeff Fitzgerald 20
Donald Friske 20
Phil Garthwaite 30
Mark Gottlieb 40
Tamara Grigsby 50
Scott Gunderson 10
Mark Gundrum 10
Steve Hilgenberg 50
Kim Hixson 50
Jim Holperin 38
Mark Honadel 60
Randy Hopper 38
Ann Hraychuck 30
Mary Hubler 30
Michael Huebsch 20
Robert Jauch 75
Andy Jorgensen 50
Theodore Kanavas 38
Dan Kapanke 38
Dean Kaufert 10
Neal Kedzie 13
Steven Kestell 30
Bill Kramer 10
Pat Kreitlow 75
Margaret Krusick 30
Alan Lasee 38
Julie Lassa 88
Mary Lazich 13
John Lehman 38
Joseph Leibham 38
Daniel LeMahieu 10
Thomas Lothian 60
Dan Meyer 20
Louis Molepske, Jr. 40
Phil Montgomery 40
John Murtha 20
Tom Nelson 30
Scott Newcomer 10
Alvin Ott 80
Joseph Parisi 50
Sandra Pasch 100
Jeffrey Plale 100
Don Pridemore 30
Mark Radcliffe 20
Kitty Rhoades 20
Jon Richards 50
Judith Robson 0
Kelda Roys 50
Marlin Schneider 40
Dale Schultz 63
Donna Seidel 50
Mike Sheridan 30
Gary Sherman 50
Jeffrey Smith 100
James Soletski 50
Richard Spanbauer 60
John Steinbrink 50
Jeffrey Stone 40
Pat Strachota 10
Scott Suder 20
Jim Sullivan 38
Barbara Toles 30
John Townsend 20
Robert Turner 50
Terry Van Akkeren 50
Karl Van Roy 60
Amy Vruwink 30
Annette Williams 80
Mary Williams 20
Jeffrey Wood 40
Robert Ziegelbauer 30
Ted Zigmunt 50
Rich Zipperer 30

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.