Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Ohio League of Conservation Voters

2005 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
OH U.S. House 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic 100%
OH U.S. House 4 Jim Jordan Republican 66%
OH U.S. House 5 Bob Latta Republican 50%
OH U.S. House 7 Bob Gibbs Republican 50%
OH Lieutenant Governor Mary Taylor Republican 50%
OH State House 7 Thomas Patton Republican 50%
OH State House 24 James Hughes Republican 50%
OH State House 27 Tom Brinkman, Jr. Republican 100%
OH State House 30 William Seitz Republican 50%
OH State House 39 Fred Strahorn Democratic 75%
OH State House 45 Teresa Fedor Democratic 100%
OH State House 48 Kirk Schuring Republican 66%
OH State House 59 John Boccieri Democratic 100%
OH State House 77 Tim Schaffer Republican 50%
OH State House 78 Ron Hood Republican 25%
OH State House 84 Keith Faber Republican 50%
OH State Senate 2 Randall Gardner Republican 66%
OH State Senate 4 William Coley II Republican 50%
OH State Senate 11 Edna Brown Democratic 100%
OH State Senate 14 Joe Uecker Republican 50%
OH State Senate 23 Michael Skindell Democratic 100%
OH State Senate 24 Matthew Dolan Republican 50%
OH State Senate 25 Kenny Yuko Democratic 100%
OH State Senate 29 W. Scott Oelslager Republican 50%
OH State Senate 31 Jay Hottinger Republican 66%
OH Secretary of State Jon Husted Republican 50%
OH Mayor At-Large Timothy DeGeeter 75%
OH Council Member 2 Dale Miller 100%
OH Council Member 3 Dan Brady 66%
OH Council Member 3 Peter Ujvagi Democratic 100%
OH Council Member At-Large Joseph Koziura 75%
OH Commissioner At-Large Kathleen Chandler 75%
OH Commissioner At-Large Thom Collier 50%
OH Commissioner At-Large Anthony Core 50%
OH Township Committee Member At-Large Kenneth Carano, Sr. Democratic 100%
Dixie Allen 100%
Ron Amstutz 66%
Jeffry Armbruster 33%
James Aslanides 50%
Steve Austria 66%
Catherine Barrett 100%
Charles Blasdel II 25%
Louis Blessing, Jr. 50%
Todd Book 100%
Danny Bubp 50%
Stephen Buehrer 50%
Charles Calvert 50%
John Carey, Jr. 66%
James Carmichael 50%
Timothy Cassell 50%
Gary Cates 66%
Patricia Clancy 66%
Courtney Combs 25%
Kevin Coughlin 66%
David Daniels 50%
Marc Dann 100%
Michael DeBose 100%
Kevin DeWine 50%
L. George Distel 25%
John Domenick 100%
Steve Driehaus 100%
Clyde Evans 50%
David Evans 50%
Lorraine Fende 75%
Diana Fessler 50%
Eric Fingerhut 100%
Larry Flowers 50%
Jennifer Garrison 75%
Michael Gilb 50%
David Goodman 66%
Timothy Grendell 66%
John Hagan 50%
Robert Hagan 100%
Bill Harris 66%
William Hartnett 50%
Sandra Harwood 100%
William Healy II 75%
James Hoops 50%
Jeff Jacobson 66%
Annie Key 75%
Sally Conway Kilbane 50%
Randy Law 50%
Earl Martin 50%
Lance Mason 100%
Jim McGregor 50%
I. Miller, Jr. 100%
Mike Mitchell 100%
Larry Mumper 66%
Thomas Niehaus 66%
Robert Otterman 100%
Joy Padgett 66%
Sylvester Patton, Jr. 100%
Jeanine Perry 75%
Jon Peterson 75%
C.J. Prentiss 66%
Tom Raga 50%
Jim Raussen 50%
Chris Redfern 75%
Kathleen Reed 25%
Linda Reidelbach 50%
Steve Reinhard 50%
Thomas Roberts 100%
Allan Sayre 100%
John Schlichter 50%
Michelle Schneider 50%
Robert Schuler 66%
Derrick Seaver 25%
Arlene Setzer 50%
Geoffrey Smith 50%
Shirley Smith 100%
Robert Spada 66%
Daniel Stewart 100%
Jimmy Stewart 75%
Barbara Ann Sykes 75%
James Trakas 25%
Lynn Wachtmann 66%
Jeff Wagner 50%
Mark Wagoner, Jr. 50%
Kathleen Walcher 25%
Shawn Webster 50%
John White 50%
Christopher Widener 50%
John Widowfield 50%
John Willamowski 50%
Brian Williams 100%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 66%
Larry Wolpert 50%
Claudette Woodard 100%
Tyrone Yates 100%
Kimberly Zurz 66%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top