Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Ohio League of Conservation Voters

2004 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
OH U.S. House 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic 90%
OH U.S. House 4 Jim Jordan Republican 60%
OH U.S. House 5 Bob Latta Republican 80%
OH U.S. House 7 Bob Gibbs Republican 80%
OH Lieutenant Governor Mary Taylor Republican 40%
OH State House 7 Thomas Patton Republican 80%
OH State House 24 James Hughes Republican 80%
OH State House 27 Tom Brinkman, Jr. Republican 80%
OH State House 30 William Seitz Republican 80%
OH State House 38 Marilyn Slaby Republican 70%
OH State House 39 Fred Strahorn Democratic 100%
OH State House 45 Teresa Fedor Democratic 80%
OH State House 48 Kirk Schuring Republican 70%
OH State House 59 John Boccieri Democratic 90%
OH State House 61 Ronald Young Republican 40%
OH State House 72 Larry Householder Republican 80%
OH State House 77 Tim Schaffer Republican 70%
OH State House 84 Keith Faber Republican 60%
OH State Senate 2 Randall Gardner Republican 80%
OH State Senate 11 Edna Brown Democratic 90%
OH State Senate 23 Michael Skindell Democratic 100%
OH State Senate 29 W. Scott Oelslager Republican 60%
OH State Senate 31 Jay Hottinger Republican 80%
OH Secretary of State Jon Husted Republican 80%
OH Mayor At-Large Timothy DeGeeter 100%
OH Council Member 2 Dale Miller 100%
OH Council Member 3 Dan Brady 70%
OH Council Member 3 Peter Ujvagi Democratic 100%
OH Council Member At-Large Joseph Koziura 100%
OH Council Member At-Large Daniel Sferra 60%
OH Commissioner At-Large Kathleen Chandler 100%
OH Commissioner At-Large Thom Collier 80%
OH Commissioner At-Large Anthony Core 80%
OH Township Committee Member At-Large Kenneth Carano, Sr. Democratic 100%
OH State Board of Education Nancy Hollister 80%
Dixie Allen 80%
Ron Amstutz 80%
Jeffry Armbruster 60%
James Aslanides 80%
Steve Austria 80%
Catherine Barrett 100%
Charles Blasdel II 80%
Louis Blessing, Jr. 80%
Todd Book 70%
Stephen Buehrer 50%
James Callender 40%
Charles Calvert 50%
John Carey, Jr. 80%
James Carmichael 80%
Gary Cates 50%
Mary Cirelli 60%
Patricia Clancy 80%
Courtney Combs 70%
Kevin Coughlin 70%
David Daniels 80%
Marc Dann 80%
Michael DeBose 70%
Kevin DeWine 80%
Gregory DiDonato 60%
L. George Distel 80%
John Domenick 90%
Steve Driehaus 100%
Clyde Evans 60%
David Evans 80%
Diana Fessler 60%
Eric Fingerhut 50%
Larry Flowers 80%
Robert Gardner 100%
Michael Gilb 60%
David Goodman 80%
Timothy Grendell 60%
John Hagan 50%
Robert Hagan 70%
Bill Harris 80%
William Hartnett 80%
Sandra Harwood 80%
James Hoops 60%
Jeff Jacobson 80%
Ed Jerse 80%
Merle Grace Kearns 80%
Annie Key 100%
Sally Conway Kilbane 70%
Mark Mallory 80%
Earl Martin 80%
Lance Mason 80%
Jim McGregor 80%
I. Miller, Jr. 70%
Larry Mumper 80%
Scott Nein 80%
Thomas Niehaus 80%
Lynn Olman 80%
Robert Otterman 70%
Joy Padgett 80%
Sylvester Patton, Jr. 90%
Jeanine Perry 100%
Jon Peterson 80%
C.J. Prentiss 50%
Larry Price 90%
Tom Raga 60%
Jim Raussen 100%
Chris Redfern 100%
Kathleen Reed 80%
Linda Reidelbach 80%
Steve Reinhard 60%
Thomas Roberts 80%
John Schlichter 80%
Jean Schmidt 60%
Michelle Schneider 60%
Robert Schuler 80%
Derrick Seaver 50%
Arlene Setzer 80%
Geoffrey Smith 80%
Shirley Smith 90%
Robert Spada 100%
Daniel Stewart 100%
Jimmy Stewart 80%
Barbara Ann Sykes 70%
James Trakas 50%
Lynn Wachtmann 80%
Jeff Wagner 80%
Kathleen Walcher 80%
Shawn Webster 80%
Doug White 80%
John White 70%
Christopher Widener 80%
John Widowfield 70%
John Willamowski 80%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 80%
Larry Wolpert 80%
Claudette Woodard 80%
Tyrone Yates 100%
Kimberly Zurz 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top