Rating Group: Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters

2009-2010 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 100%
WI U.S. House-6 Glenn Grothman R 36%
WI State Assembly-6 Gary Tauchen R 44%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 94%
WI State Assembly-11 Jason Fields D 94%
WI State Assembly-12 Frederick Kessler D 89%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 94%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 100%
WI State Assembly-23 Jim Ott R 44%
WI State Assembly-24 Dan Knodl R 33%
WI State Assembly-36 Jeffrey Mursau R 78%
WI State Assembly-38 Joel Kleefisch R 6%
WI State Assembly-40 Kevin Petersen R 41%
WI State Assembly-41 Joan Ballweg R 44%
WI State Assembly-42 Keith Ripp R 83%
WI State Assembly-46 Gary Hebl D 100%
WI State Assembly-50 Ed Brooks R 67%
WI State Assembly-54 Gordon Hintz D 100%
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 39%
WI State Assembly-63 Robin Vos R 11%
WI State Assembly-64 Peter Barca D 100%
WI State Assembly-66 Cory Mason D 100%
WI State Assembly-73 Nick Milroy D 100%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 100%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 100%
WI State Assembly-89 John Nygren R 39%
WI State Assembly-96 Lee Nerison R 72%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 67%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 92%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 67%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 22%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 50%
WI State Senate-11 Stephen Nass R 24%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 50%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 67%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 92%
WI State Senate-19 Roger Roth, Jr. R 58%
WI State Senate-22 Bob Wirch D 100%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 92%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 83%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 56%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 75%
WI State Senate-31 Kathleen Vinehout D 75%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 100%
WI Supervisor-17 Tony Staskunas 100%
Chuck Benedict 100%
Penny Bernard Schaber 100%
Garey Bies 83%
Spencer Black 100%
Fred Clark 100%
G. Spencer Coggs 92%
Pedro Colon 100%
David Cullen 100%
Chris Danou 94%
Brett Davis 44%
Russell Decker 83%
Kristen Dexter 100%
Michael Ellis 75%
Jeff Fitzgerald 50%
Donald Friske 53%
Phil Garthwaite 89%
Mark Gottlieb 50%
Tamara Grigsby 100%
Scott Gunderson 44%
Mark Gundrum 35%
Sheila Harsdorf 58%
Steve Hilgenberg 100%
Kim Hixson 94%
Jim Holperin 83%
Mark Honadel 56%
Randy Hopper 50%
Ann Hraychuck 100%
Mary Hubler 100%
Michael Huebsch 56%
Robert Jauch 92%
Andy Jorgensen 100%
Theodore Kanavas 42%
Dan Kapanke 67%
Dean Kaufert 100%
Neal Kedzie 42%
Steven Kestell 61%
Bill Kramer 19%
Pat Kreitlow 83%
Margaret Krusick 94%
Alan Lasee 33%
Julie Lassa 75%
Mary Lazich 33%
John Lehman 100%
Joseph Leibham 50%
Daniel LeMahieu 33%
Thomas Lothian 50%
Dan Meyer 72%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 100%
Phil Montgomery 50%
John Murtha 53%
Tom Nelson 100%
Scott Newcomer 6%
Alvin Ott 83%
Joseph Parisi 100%
Sandra Pasch 100%
Jeffrey Plale 83%
Don Pridemore 22%
Mark Radcliffe 94%
Kitty Rhoades 56%
Jon Richards 100%
Judith Robson 100%
Kelda Roys 100%
Marlin Schneider 94%
Dale Schultz 75%
Donna Seidel 100%
Mike Sheridan 100%
Gary Sherman 100%
Jeffrey Smith 100%
James Soletski 100%
Richard Spanbauer 83%
John Steinbrink 94%
Jeffrey Stone 40%
Pat Strachota 47%
Scott Suder 33%
Jim Sullivan 83%
Barbara Toles 100%
John Townsend 56%
Robert Turner 94%
Terry Van Akkeren 100%
Karl Van Roy 78%
Amy Vruwink 94%
Annette Williams 100%
Mary Williams 67%
Jeffrey Wood 78%
Robert Ziegelbauer 83%
Ted Zigmunt 89%
Rich Zipperer 28%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.