Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters

2005-2006 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House 2 Mark Pocan Democratic 100%
WI U.S. House 6 Glenn Grothman Republican 24%
WI State Assembly 11 Jason Fields Democratic 94%
WI State Assembly 20 Christine Sinicki Democratic 91%
WI State Assembly 36 Jeffrey Mursau Republican 6%
WI State Assembly 41 Joan Ballweg Republican 13%
WI State Assembly 46 Gary Hebl Democratic 100%
WI State Assembly 61 Samantha Kerkman Republican 12%
WI State Assembly 63 Robin Vos Republican 12%
WI State Assembly 80 Sondy Pope Democratic 94%
WI State Senate 2 Robert Cowles Republican 50%
WI State Senate 3 Timothy Carpenter Democratic 94%
WI State Senate 4 Lena Taylor Democratic 83%
WI State Senate 8 Alberta Darling Republican 39%
WI State Senate 11 Stephen Nass Republican 18%
WI State Senate 13 Scott Fitzgerald Republican 39%
WI State Senate 14 Luther Olsen Republican 50%
WI State Senate 16 Mark Miller Democratic 94%
WI State Senate 22 Bob Wirch Democratic 89%
WI State Senate 26 Fred Risser Democratic 94%
WI State Senate 27 Jon Erpenbach Democratic 100%
WI State Senate 29 Jerry Petrowski Republican 24%
WI State Senate 30 Dave Hansen Democratic 89%
WI State Senate 32 Jennifer Shilling Democratic 82%
WI Supervisor 3 Sheldon Wasserman 88%
WI Supervisor 16 John Ainsworth 0%
WI Supervisor 17 Tony Staskunas 76%
Sheryl Albers 19%
Chuck Benedict 94%
Terese Berceau 100%
Garey Bies 6%
Spencer Black 100%
Frank Boyle 94%
Roger Breske 83%
Ron Brown 44%
G. Spencer Coggs 94%
Pedro Colon 94%
David Cullen 88%
Brett Davis 18%
Russell Decker 83%
Michael Ellis 50%
Jeff Fitzgerald 6%
Stephen Freese 12%
Donald Friske 6%
John Gard 6%
Curt Gielow 6%
Mark Gottlieb 12%
Tamara Grigsby 88%
Barbara Gronemus 53%
Scott Gunderson 6%
Mark Gundrum 6%
Eugene Hahn 6%
Sheila Harsdorf 50%
J.A. Hines 12%
Mark Honadel 6%
Mary Hubler 94%
Michael Huebsch 6%
Jean Hundertmark 6%
Robert Jauch 94%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 6%
Theodore Kanavas 39%
Dan Kapanke 50%
Dean Kaufert 6%
Neal Kedzie 44%
Frederick Kessler 88%
Steven Kestell 6%
Joel Kleefisch 6%
Judy Krawczyk 6%
Robin Kreibich 19%
James Kreuser 82%
Margaret Krusick 82%
Andy Lamb 7%
Alan Lasee 39%
Frank Lasee 12%
Julie Lassa 100%
Mary Lazich 28%
John Lehman 100%
Joseph Leibham 41%
Daniel LeMahieu 6%
Gabe Loeffelholz 6%
Thomas Lothian 18%
Terri McCormick 18%
Dan Meyer 6%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 100%
Phil Montgomery 6%
Terry Moulton 6%
Terry Musser 6%
Tom Nelson 82%
Lee Nerison 12%
Scott Newcomer 14%
Ann Nischke 0%
Alvin Ott 29%
Carol Owens 6%
Joseph Parisi 100%
Mark Pettis 12%
Jeffrey Plale 83%
Don Pridemore 6%
Tom Reynolds 22%
Kitty Rhoades 6%
Jon Richards 94%
Judith Robson 89%
Carol Roessler 50%
Marlin Schneider 100%
Dale Schultz 39%
Donna Seidel 94%
Mike Sheridan 100%
Gary Sherman 100%
John Steinbrink 82%
Cathy Stepp 44%
Jeffrey Stone 6%
Pat Strachota 6%
Scott Suder 18%
Barbara Toles 94%
Debra Towns 6%
John Townsend 6%
David Travis 94%
Robert Turner 94%
Gregg Underheim 6%
Terry Van Akkeren 88%
Karl Van Roy 6%
Amy Vruwink 81%
Leah Vukmir 12%
David Ward 12%
Steve Wieckert 6%
Annette Williams 92%
Mary Williams 19%
Jeffrey Wood 12%
Leon Young 94%
Josh Zepnick 88%
Robert Ziegelbauer 59%
David Zien 39%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top