Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Border Action Network

2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AZ U.S. House 5 Andy Biggs Republican 16%
AZ U.S. House 9 Kyrsten Sinema Democratic 88%
AZ State House 27 Rebecca Rios Democratic 59%
AZ State Senate 3 Olivia Cajero Bedford Democratic 84%
AZ State Senate 6 Sylvia Allen Republican 43%
AZ State Senate 9 Steve Farley Democratic 90%
AZ State Senate 10 Dave Bradley Democratic 89%
AZ State Senate 15 Nancy Barto Republican 42%
AZ State Senate 17 Steven Yarbrough Republican 32%
AZ State Senate 22 Judy Burges Republican 25%
AZ State Senate 23 John Kavanagh Republican 21%
AZ State Senate 30 Robert Meza Democratic 79%
AZ Secretary of State Michele Reagan Republican 38%
AZ Mayor At-Large Jay Tibshraeny 48%
AZ Mayor At-Large Jerry Weiers Republican 36%
AZ Council Member 2 Jim Waring 51%
AZ Council Member At-Large David Schapira Democratic 90%
Ed Ableser 87%
Paula Aboud 69%
Kirk Adams 31%
Amanda Aguirre 54%
Carolyn Allen 46%
Manny Alvarez 67%
Ray Barnes 27%
Tom Boone 39%
Jack Brown 74%
Robert Burns 42%
Meg Burton Cahill 71%
Chad Campbell 89%
Cloves Campbell, Jr. 86%
Tom Chabin 93%
Ken Cheuvront 67%
Rich Crandall 33%
Sam Crump 26%
Adam Driggs 35%
Martha Garcia 84%
Pamela Gorman 42%
Ron Gould 36%
Chuck Gray 42%
Linda Gray 46%
Albert Hale 55%
Jack Harper 47%
John Huppenthal 46%
Bill Konopnicki 45%
Leah Landrum Taylor 48%
Barbara Leff 46%
Phil Lopes 87%
Linda Lopez 81%
David Lujan 71%
Lucy Mason 34%
John McComish 41%
Debbie McCune Davis 80%
Barbara McGuire 67%
Nancy McLain 35%
Ben Miranda 89%
Rick Murphy 27%
John Nelson 39%
Warde Nichols 29%
Lynne Pancrazi 89%
Andy Tobin, Sr. 43%
Thayer Verschoor 52%
Jim Weiers 33%
Nancy Young Wright 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top