Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Humane Society Legislative Fund-Louisiana

2006-2007 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. Senate Jr Bill Cassidy Republican 100%
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 100%
LA U.S. House 2 Cedric Richmond Democratic 45%
LA State House 1 James Morris Republican 80%
LA State House 21 Andy Anders Democratic 40%
LA State House 72 Robby Carter Democratic 64%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 45%
LA State Senate 5 Karen Peterson Democratic 100%
LA State Senate 6 Bodi White, Jr. Republican 73%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 45%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 91%
LA State Senate 13 Dale Erdey Republican 64%
LA State Senate 14 Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb Democratic 64%
LA State Senate 15 Regina Barrow Democratic 64%
LA State Senate 18 Eddie Lambert Republican 82%
LA State Senate 19 Gary Smith, Jr. Democratic 73%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 73%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 64%
LA State Senate 28 Eric LaFleur Democratic 45%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 64%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 91%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 73%
LA State Senate 35 James Fannin Republican 73%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 83%
LA Parish President At-Large Errol Romero 64%
Robert Adley 83%
Ernest Alexander 100%
Jody Amedee 92%
Glenn Ansardi 91%
Jeff Arnold 73%
Austin Badon, Jr. 64%
Diana Bajoie 92%
Damon Baldone 64%
Robert Barham 83%
Clara Baudoin 36%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 73%
Gary Beard 100%
Walter Boasso 75%
Shirley Bowler 91%
Sharon Broome 100%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 55%
Sherri Buffington 92%
Tim Burns 100%
Roy Burrell 64%
James Cain 58%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 82%
Joel Chaisson II 100%
Billy Chandler 45%
Carl Crane 82%
Donald Cravins, Jr. 83%
A. Crowe, Jr. 100%
Israel Curtis 55%
N. J. Damico 73%
William Daniel IV 82%
Carla Dartez 55%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 55%
Jean Doerge 55%
Gordon Dove, Sr. 73%
Hollis Downs 73%
Ann Duplessis 67%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 100%
Sydnie Mae Durand 55%
Noble Ellington 83%
Rick Farrar 64%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 73%
Cleo Fields 42%
Heulette Fontenot 50%
Mickey Frith 73%
Richard Gallot, Jr. 64%
Butch Gautreaux 100%
Nick Gautreaux 33%
Brett Geymann 91%
Cheryl Gray Evans 82%
Hunter Greene 73%
Elbert Guillory 20%
Elcie Guillory 64%
Mickey Guillory 55%
Terrell Harris 55%
Alexander Heaton 73%
Troy Hebert 55%
Francis Heitmeier 83%
Herman Ray Hill 64%
Donald Hines 42%
Ken Hollis 100%
Avon Honey 45%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 55%
Nita Hutter 91%
Lydia Jackson 100%
Michael Jackson 64%
Jalila Jefferson-Bullock 64%
Charles Jones 75%
Kay Katz 91%
Donald Kennard 45%
Lelon Kenney 73%
Charles Kleckley 91%
Robert Kostelka 100%
John LaBruzzo, Jr. 82%
Juan LaFonta 64%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 82%
Arthur Lentini 100%
Nick Lorusso 100%
Max Malone 83%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 58%
Charles McDonald 73%
Joe McPherson 75%
Thomas McVea 55%
Michael Michot 67%
Billy Montgomery 64%
Willie Mount 92%
Edwin Murray 92%
Ben Nevers, Sr. 75%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 55%
Wilfred Pierre 55%
Gillis Pinac 73%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 100%
Henry Powell 82%
Michael Powell 100%
Julie Quinn 83%
Harold Ritchie 55%
Joel Robideaux 82%
Craig Romero 33%
Joe Salter 55%
Pete Schneider III 82%
Derrick Shepherd 50%
M. J. Smiley, Jr. 91%
Jack Smith 55%
Jane Smith 100%
Kenneth Smith 83%
Karen St Germain 55%
Charmaine Stiaes 64%
Mike Strain 82%
Gerald Theunissen 75%
Joseph Toomy 100%
Thomas Townsend 64%
Donald Trahan 64%
Warren Triche, Jr. 100%
Jim Tucker 91%
J. Chris Ullo 100%
Wayne Waddell 100%
Monica Walker 73%
Patrick Williams 60%
Diane Winston 91%
Ernest Wooton 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top