Rating Group: Prevent Child Abuse Wyoming

2005 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WY U.S. Senate-Jr John Barrasso R 100%
WY State House-37 Steve Harshman R 93%
WY State House-43 Daniel Zwonitzer R 93%
WY State House-55 David Miller R 79%
WY State Senate-3 Curt Meier R 93%
WY State Senate-13 John Hastert D 100%
WY State Senate-18 Henry Coe R 100%
WY State Senate-21 Bruce Burns R 100%
WY State Senate-23 Jeff Wasserburger R 100%
WY State Senate-24 Michael Von Flatern R 100%
WY State Senate-25 Cale Case R 93%
WY State Senate-30 Charles Scott R 100%
WY State Board of Education Kathryn Sessions D 93%
Deborah Alden 79%
James Anderson 100%
Rodney Anderson 79%
Patricia Aullman 100%
George Bagby 100%
Bruce Barnard 86%
Rosie Berger 100%
Tex Boggs 100%
Bob Brechtel 71%
Kermit Brown 93%
Ed Buchanan 86%
Kurt Bucholz 79%
Charles Childers 100%
Roy Cohee 93%
Stan Cooper 93%
Kathy Davison 86%
Ken Decaria 100%
Ross Diercks 79%
David Edwards 93%
Floyd Esquibel 100%
Gerald Gay 100%
Gerald Geis 100%
Mary Meyer Gilmore 86%
Keith Gingery 93%
Patrick Goggles 93%
James Hageman 71%
Debbie Hammons 100%
John Hanes 100%
Elaine Harvey 79%
Bill Hawks 100%
Becket Hinckley 86%
John Hines 100%
Jerry Iekel 93%
Pete Illoway 100%
Burke Jackson 57%
Kit Jennings 93%
Rae Lynn Job 86%
Wayne Johnson 100%
Alan Jones 93%
Peter Jorgensen 7%
Jack Landon, Jr. 93%
Grant Larson 100%
Frank Latta 79%
Tom Lockhart 86%
Tom Lubnau II 93%
Randall Luthi 71%
Marty Martin 100%
Mike Massie 100%
Del McOmie 93%
R. Larry Meuli 93%
E. Jayne Mockler 100%
Layton Morgan 100%
Philip Nicholas 100%
Monte Olsen 64%
Douglas Osborn 100%
Robert Peck 100%
Bryan Pedersen 93%
Owen Petersen 100%
Frank Philp 71%
Mick Powers 79%
Lorraine Quarberg 79%
Paul Wayne Reese 79%
Ann Robinson 100%
Tony Ross 100%
Doug Samuelson 93%
John Schiffer 100%
Mark Semlek 71%
Colin Simpson 100%
James Slater 100%
Bill Thompson 100%
Charles Townsend 100%
Bill Vasey 100%
Tom Walsh 93%
Jane Warren 100%
Stephen Watt 71%
Kevin White 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.