Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Illinois Family Institute

1998 Positions

Issues: Social , Religion
State Office District Name Party Rating
IL U.S. House 12 Michael Bost Republican 100%
IL U.S. House 14 Randy Hultgren Republican 100%
IL State House 1 Daniel Burke Democratic 57%
IL State House 12 Sara Feigenholtz Democratic 67%
IL State House 16 Lou Lang Democratic 57%
IL State House 20 Michael McAuliffe Republican 90%
IL State House 22 Michael Madigan Democratic 71%
IL State House 25 Barbara Currie Democratic 57%
IL State House 31 Mary Flowers Democratic 57%
IL State House 47 Patricia Bellock Republican 100%
IL State House 82 Jim Durkin Republican 89%
IL State House 88 Keith Sommer Republican 100%
IL State House 101 Bill Mitchell Republican 100%
IL State House 113 Jay Hoffman Democratic 100%
IL State Senate 35 Dave Syverson Republican 100%
IL State Senate 44 Bill Brady, Jr. Republican 100%
IL State Senate 55 Dale Righter Republican 100%
IL Auditor General Frank Mautino Democratic 56%
IL Supervisor At-Large M. Maggie Crotty Democratic 100%
IL Commissioner 12 John Fritchey 57%
Edward Acevedo 57%
Mark Beaubien, Jr. 80%
Robert Biggins 100%
William Black 60%
Michael Boland 50%
Larry Bomke 100%
Evelyn Bowles 67%
Richard Bradley 89%
James Brosnahan 100%
Joel Brunsvold 83%
Robert Bugielski 83%
J. Burzynski 100%
Ralph Capparelli 100%
Elizabeth Coulson 67%
Mary Lou Cowlishaw 90%
Tom Cross 67%
Julie Curry 83%
Lee Daniels 100%
Thomas Dart 80%
Monique Davis 57%
Steve Davis 57%
James DeLeo 100%
Miguel Del Valle 67%
Vince Demuzio 100%
Kirk Dillard 100%
Walter Dudycz 100%
Judy Erwin 57%
Beverly Fawell 83%
James Fowler 100%
Jack Franks 88%
Lauren Beth Gash 57%
Adeline Jay Geo-Karis 78%
Michael Giglio 83%
Calvin Giles 67%
Kurt Granberg 100%
Gary Hannig 100%
Charles Hartke 80%
Brent Hassert 83%
Carl Hawkinson 90%
Rickey Hendon 50%
Douglas Hoeft 100%
Thomas Holbrook 83%
Constance Howard 57%
Thomas Lee Johnson 100%
Tim Johnson 80%
Emil Jones, Jr. 60%
John Jones 90%
Lovana Jones 50%
Shirley Jones 67%
Doris Karpiel 100%
Howard Kenner 57%
Dick Klemm 60%
Gwenn Klingler 80%
Renée Kosel 100%
Carolyn Krause 67%
I. Ronald Lawfer 100%
David Leitch 83%
Patricia Lindner 67%
Edgar Lopez 67%
David Luechtefeld 100%
Eileen Lyons 100%
Joseph Lyons 100%
William Mahar 100%
John Maitland, Jr. 67%
Kevin McCarthy 100%
John McGuire 71%
Larry McKeon 57%
James Meyer 100%
Gerald Mitchell 89%
Don Moffitt 100%
Andrea Moore 83%
Charles Morrow III 57%
Rosemary Mulligan 71%
Harold Murphy 67%
Judith Myers 100%
Richard Myers 100%
N. Duane Noland 100%
John Philip Novak 100%
Barack Obama II 80%
Mary O'Brien 100%
Carole Pankau 100%
Terry Parke 100%
Kathleen Parker 80%
Vincent Persico 100%
William Peterson 100%
James Philip 100%
Raymond Poe 100%
Coy Pugh 57%
James Rea 100%
Dan Reitz 89%
Carol Ronen 57%
Dan Rutherford 88%
Tom Ryder 100%
Skip Saviano 100%
Timothy Schmitz 100%
Jeffrey Schoenberg 67%
Douglas Scott 40%
George Scully, Jr. 100%
George Shadid 50%
Todd Sieben 100%
Sonia Silva 60%
Cal Skinner 100%
Ricca Slone 60%
Michael Smith 80%
Ron Stephens 90%
Todd Stroger 70%
Arthur Tenhouse 83%
Donne Trotter 67%
Arthur Turner, Sr. 80%
John Turner 100%
Louis Viverito 100%
Ronald Wait 100%
Lawrence Walsh, Sr. 100%
Thomas Walsh 89%
Frank Watson 90%
Stanley Blake Weaver 100%
Patrick Welch 100%
Richard Winkel, Jr. 100%
David Winters 100%
David Wirsing 100%
Kathleen Wojcik 100%
Larry Woolard 100%
Wyvetter Younge 57%
Anne Zickus 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top