Rating Group: Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce

2010 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 12%
WI U.S. House-6 Glenn Grothman R 80%
WI State Assembly-6 Gary Tauchen R 87%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 37%
WI State Assembly-11 Jason Fields D 12%
WI State Assembly-12 Frederick Kessler D 14%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 25%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 12%
WI State Assembly-23 Jim Ott R 100%
WI State Assembly-24 Dan Knodl R 87%
WI State Assembly-36 Jeffrey Mursau R 87%
WI State Assembly-38 Joel Kleefisch R 87%
WI State Assembly-40 Kevin Petersen R 100%
WI State Assembly-41 Joan Ballweg R 100%
WI State Assembly-42 Keith Ripp R 62%
WI State Assembly-46 Gary Hebl D 12%
WI State Assembly-50 Ed Brooks R 100%
WI State Assembly-54 Gordon Hintz D 12%
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 100%
WI State Assembly-63 Robin Vos R 87%
WI State Assembly-64 Peter Barca D 12%
WI State Assembly-66 Cory Mason D 12%
WI State Assembly-73 Nick Milroy D 12%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 12%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 12%
WI State Assembly-89 John Nygren R 100%
WI State Assembly-96 Lee Nerison R 75%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 100%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 40%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 60%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 100%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 75%
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 100%
WI State Senate-11 Stephen Nass R 100%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 100%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 100%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 40%
WI State Senate-19 Roger Roth, Jr. R 87%
WI State Senate-22 Bob Wirch D 40%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 40%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 60%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 100%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 60%
WI State Senate-31 Kathleen Vinehout D 60%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 12%
WI Supervisor-17 Tony Staskunas 12%
Chuck Benedict 12%
Penny Bernard Schaber 12%
Garey Bies 87%
Spencer Black 12%
Fred Clark 12%
G. Spencer Coggs 40%
Pedro Colon 25%
David Cullen 12%
Chris Danou 12%
Brett Davis 100%
Russell Decker 60%
Kristen Dexter 12%
Michael Ellis 100%
Jeff Fitzgerald 100%
Donald Friske 85%
Phil Garthwaite 12%
Mark Gottlieb 100%
Tamara Grigsby 12%
Scott Gunderson 100%
Mark Gundrum 100%
Steve Hilgenberg 12%
Kim Hixson 12%
Jim Holperin 60%
Mark Honadel 100%
Randy Hopper 100%
Ann Hraychuck 12%
Mary Hubler 12%
Michael Huebsch 100%
Robert Jauch 40%
Andy Jorgensen 12%
Theodore Kanavas 100%
Dan Kapanke 80%
Dean Kaufert 62%
Neal Kedzie 100%
Steven Kestell 100%
Bill Kramer 87%
Pat Kreitlow 60%
Margaret Krusick 12%
Alan Lasee 100%
Julie Lassa 60%
Mary Lazich 100%
John Lehman 40%
Joseph Leibham 100%
Daniel LeMahieu 87%
Thomas Lothian 75%
Dan Meyer 87%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 12%
Phil Montgomery 100%
John Murtha 100%
Tom Nelson 12%
Scott Newcomer 87%
Alvin Ott 62%
Joseph Parisi 12%
Sandra Pasch 12%
Jeffrey Plale 60%
Don Pridemore 100%
Mark Radcliffe 25%
Kitty Rhoades 100%
Jon Richards 12%
Judith Robson 40%
Kelda Roys 12%
Marlin Schneider 12%
Dale Schultz 100%
Donna Seidel 12%
Mike Sheridan 12%
Gary Sherman 12%
Jeffrey Smith 12%
James Soletski 12%
Richard Spanbauer 60%
John Steinbrink 25%
Jeffrey Stone 100%
Pat Strachota 87%
Scott Suder 100%
Jim Sullivan 60%
Barbara Toles 12%
John Townsend 87%
Robert Turner 12%
Terry Van Akkeren 12%
Karl Van Roy 87%
Amy Vruwink 12%
Annette Williams 33%
Mary Williams 75%
Jeffrey Wood 25%
Robert Ziegelbauer 85%
Ted Zigmunt 12%
Rich Zipperer 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.