Rating Group: Dakota Resource Council

2007 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
ND State House-1 Patrick Hatlestad R 57%
ND State House-1 Gary Sukut R 43%
ND State House-8 Jeff Delzer R 14%
ND State House-9 Tracy Boe D-NPL 71%
ND State House-10 Charles Damschen R 43%
ND State House-10 David Monson R 57%
ND State House-13 Kim Koppelman R 43%
ND State House-14 Jon Nelson R 83%
ND State House-14 Robin Weisz R 50%
ND State House-15 Dennis Johnson R 50%
ND State House-17 Mark Owens R 71%
ND State House-23 Don Vigesaa R 57%
ND State House-27 Randy Boehning R 43%
ND State House-28 Michael Don Brandenburg R 29%
ND State House-29 Craig Headland R 29%
ND State House-29 Chet Pollert R 43%
ND State House-32 Lisa Meier R 57%
ND State House-33 Gary Kreidt R 71%
ND State House-34 Todd Porter R 43%
ND State House-35 Karen Karls R 43%
ND State House-35 Bob Martinson R 43%
ND State House-38 Larry Bellew R 43%
ND State House-38 Dan Ruby R 14%
ND State House-39 Keith Kempenich R 57%
ND State House-41 Al Carlson R 14%
ND State House-43 Lois Delmore D-NPL 67%
ND State House-46 James Kasper R 43%
ND State House-47 George Keiser R 57%
ND State House-47 Lawrence Klemin R 57%
ND State Senate-9 Richard Marcellais D-NPL 75%
ND State Senate-11 Tim Mathern D-NPL 86%
ND State Senate-13 Judy Lee R 38%
ND State Senate-14 Jerry Klein R 38%
ND State Senate-15 Dave Oehlke R 38%
ND State Senate-17 Ray Holmberg R 38%
ND State Senate-21 Carolyn Nelson D-NPL 75%
ND State Senate-22 Gary Lee R 50%
ND State Senate-23 Joan Heckaman D-NPL 75%
ND State Senate-24 Larry Robinson D-NPL 63%
ND State Senate-28 Robert Erbele R 25%
ND State Senate-29 Terry Wanzek R 38%
ND State Senate-32 Dick Dever R 25%
ND State Senate-34 Dwight Cook R 28%
ND State Senate-37 Rich Wardner R 25%
ND State Senate-39 Bill Bowman R 25%
ND State Senate-40 Karen Krebsbach R 38%
ND State Senate-47 Ralph Kilzer R 25%
ND Commissioner-At-Large Merle Boucher 83%
Ole Aarsvold 71%
Bill Amerman 67%
Arden Anderson 75%
John Andrist 40%
JoNell Bakke 75%
Arthur Behm 86%
Wesley Belter 33%
Rick Berg 57%
Ron Carlisle 43%
Dawn Marie Charging 57%
Randel Christmann 25%
Donald Clark 57%
Kari Lee Conrad 83%
Stacey Dahl 57%
Duane Lee DeKrey 57%
Donald Dietrich 43%
Mark Dosch 43%
David Drovdal 43%
Mary Ekstrom 86%
Tom Fiebiger 88%
Tom Fischer 38%
Tim Flakoll 50%
Layton Freborg 50%
Rod Froelich 75%
Glen Froseth 57%
Eliot Glassheim 100%
Bette Grande 29%
Chris Griffin 100%
Tony Grindberg 14%
Ed Gruchalla 86%
Pam Gulleson 67%
C.B. Haas 57%
Nick Hacker 38%
Lyle Hanson 71%
Kathy Hawken 71%
Joel Curtis Heitkamp 63%
Brenda Heller 57%
Gil Herbel 43%
Curt Hofstad 57%
Robert Horne 75%
Bob Hunskor 71%
Nancy Johnson 43%
Lee Kaldor 71%
RaeAnn Kelsch 57%
Scot Kelsh 100%
James Kerzman 100%
Joyce Kingsbury 57%
Matthew Klein 57%
Aaron Krauter 57%
William Kretschmar 57%
Joe Kroeber 71%
Elroy Lindaas 63%
Stanley Lyson 25%
Ralph Metcalf 71%
Shirley Meyer 86%
Phillip Mueller 86%
Lee Myxter 57%
Dave Nething 38%
Darrell Nottestad 50%
David O'Connell 50%
Curtis Olafson 14%
Kenton Onstad 86%
Vonnie Pietsch 43%
Louis Pinkerton 67%
Jim Pomeroy 75%
Louise Potter 67%
Tracy Potter 88%
Clara Sue Price 67%
Arlo Schmidt 71%
Jasper Schneider 83%
Tom Seymour 63%
Robert Skarphol 28%
Dorvan Solberg 71%
Bob Stenehjem 25%
Ken Svedjan 43%
Harvey Tallackson 57%
Ryan Taylor 57%
Blair Thoreson 33%
Elwood Thorpe 67%
Ben Tollefson 38%
Constance Triplett 63%
Gerald Uglem 57%
Herbert Urlacher 33%
Ben Vig 86%
Francis Wald 14%
John Wall 57%
John Warner 63%
Dave Weiler 57%
Alon Wieland 28%
Clark Williams 57%
Lisa Wolf 100%
Dwight Wrangham 28%
Steven Zaiser 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.