Rating Group: Dakota Resource Council

2005 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
ND State House-3 Andrew Maragos R 14%
ND State House-8 Jeff Delzer R 13%
ND State House-9 Tracy Boe D-NPL 67%
ND State House-10 Charles Damschen R 25%
ND State House-10 David Monson R 25%
ND State House-13 Kim Koppelman R 13%
ND State House-14 Jon Nelson R 57%
ND State House-14 Robin Weisz R 20%
ND State House-15 Dennis Johnson R 25%
ND State House-17 Mark Owens R 38%
ND State House-23 Bill Devlin R 38%
ND State House-23 Don Vigesaa R 25%
ND State House-27 Randy Boehning R 0%
ND State House-28 Michael Don Brandenburg R 13%
ND State House-29 Craig Headland R 0%
ND State House-29 Chet Pollert R 0%
ND State House-32 Lisa Meier R 13%
ND State House-33 Gary Kreidt R 13%
ND State House-34 Todd Porter R 13%
ND State House-35 Bob Martinson R 13%
ND State House-38 Larry Bellew R 13%
ND State House-38 Dan Ruby R 13%
ND State House-39 Keith Kempenich R 0%
ND State House-40 Randy Schobinger R 14%
ND State House-41 Al Carlson R 13%
ND State House-43 Lois Delmore D-NPL 63%
ND State House-46 James Kasper R 14%
ND State House-47 George Keiser R 0%
ND State House-47 Lawrence Klemin R 0%
ND State Senate-11 Tim Mathern D-NPL 100%
ND State Senate-13 Judy Lee R 0%
ND State Senate-14 Jerry Klein R 0%
ND State Senate-17 Ray Holmberg R 0%
ND State Senate-21 Carolyn Nelson D-NPL 71%
ND State Senate-22 Gary Lee R 0%
ND State Senate-24 Larry Robinson D-NPL 71%
ND State Senate-28 Robert Erbele R 17%
ND State Senate-32 Dick Dever R 14%
ND State Senate-34 Dwight Cook R 0%
ND State Senate-37 Rich Wardner R 14%
ND State Senate-39 Bill Bowman R 29%
ND State Senate-40 Karen Krebsbach R 0%
ND State Senate-47 Ralph Kilzer R 0%
ND Commissioner-At-Large Merle Boucher 88%
Ole Aarsvold 100%
Bill Amerman 100%
John Andrist 14%
Wesley Belter 0%
Dennis Bercier 100%
Rick Berg 13%
LeRoy Bernstein 0%
Richard Brown 0%
Thomas Brusegaard 25%
Ron Carlisle 13%
Dawn Marie Charging 13%
Randel Christmann 0%
Donald Clark 0%
Kari Lee Conrad 88%
Stacey Dahl 13%
Duane Lee DeKrey 13%
Donald Dietrich 0%
Mark Dosch 0%
David Drovdal 13%
Mary Ekstrom 71%
Duaine Espegard 14%
Michael Every 86%
April Fairfield 100%
Tom Fischer 0%
Tim Flakoll 0%
Layton Freborg 0%
Rod Froelich 63%
Glen Froseth 0%
Pat Galvin 13%
Eliot Glassheim 75%
Bette Grande 13%
Tony Grindberg 14%
Pam Gulleson 100%
C.B. Haas 13%
Nick Hacker 0%
Lyle Hanson 63%
Kathy Hawken 13%
Joel Curtis Heitkamp 86%
Gil Herbel 0%
Bob Hunskor 100%
Ron Iverson 13%
Nancy Johnson 0%
Lee Kaldor 88%
RaeAnn Kelsch 0%
Scot Kelsh 88%
James Kerzman 63%
Joyce Kingsbury 0%
Matthew Klein 0%
Aaron Krauter 67%
William Kretschmar 38%
Edroy Kringstad 0%
Joe Kroeber 88%
Elroy Lindaas 57%
Stanley Lyson 0%
Ralph Metcalf 75%
Shirley Meyer 71%
Phillip Mueller 88%
Duane Mutch 20%
Dave Nething 0%
Eugene Nicholas 14%
Mike Norland 0%
Darrell Nottestad 0%
David O'Connell 57%
Kenton Onstad 88%
Vonnie Pietsch 13%
Louise Potter 75%
Clara Sue Price 29%
Earl Rennerfeldt 0%
Sally Sandvig 86%
Arlo Schmidt 88%
Tom Seymour 71%
Margaret Sitte 13%
Robert Skarphol 0%
Dorvan Solberg 63%
Bob Stenehjem 14%
Ken Svedjan 29%
John Syverson 29%
Harvey Tallackson 50%
Ryan Taylor 86%
Russell Thane 14%
Blair Thoreson 13%
Elwood Thorpe 75%
Mike Timm 0%
Ben Tollefson 0%
John Traynor 0%
Thomas Trenbeath 0%
Constance Triplett 57%
Gerald Uglem 13%
Herbert Urlacher 0%
Francis Wald 0%
John Wall 25%
John Warner 100%
Dave Weiler 13%
Alon Wieland 0%
Clark Williams 38%
Dwight Wrangham 0%
Steven Zaiser 86%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.