Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NARAL Pro-Choice Wyoming

2003 Positions

Issues: Abortion
State Office District Name Party Rating
WY U.S. Senate Jr John Barrasso Republican 50%
WY State Senate 3 Curt Meier Republican 0%
WY State Senate 18 Henry Coe Republican 100%
WY State Senate 21 Bruce Burns Republican 75%
WY State Senate 23 Jeff Wasserburger Republican 71%
WY State Senate 25 Cale Case Republican 100%
WY State Senate 30 Charles Scott Republican 83%
WY State Board of Education Kathryn Sessions Democratic 43%
James Anderson 14%
Rodney Anderson 0%
George Bagby 100%
Michael Baker 0%
Billie Barton 57%
Bob Brechtel 0%
Kurt Bucholz 50%
Rich Cathcart 80%
Roy Cohee 0%
Stan Cooper 13%
Ken Decaria 67%
Irene Devin 83%
Ross Diercks 100%
David Edwards 100%
Richard Erb 0%
Floyd Esquibel 100%
Gerald Geis 0%
Elisabeth Gentile 50%
Keith Goodenough 100%
James Hageman 38%
John Hanes 100%
Elaine Harvey 25%
Bill Hawks 100%
Jerry Iekel 0%
Pete Illoway 63%
Jene Jansen 67%
Rae Lynn Job 100%
Lorna Johnson 100%
Wayne Johnson 100%
Peter Jorgensen 75%
April Brimmer Kunz 0%
Jack Landon, Jr. 75%
Grant Larson 0%
Clarene Law 0%
Randall Luthi 50%
Mike Massie 100%
George McMurtrey 88%
Del McOmie 100%
R. Larry Meuli 100%
E. Jayne Mockler 100%
Layton Morgan 71%
Philip Nicholas 57%
Laness Northrup 50%
Monte Olsen 67%
Douglas Osborn 75%
Fred Parady 75%
Robert Peck 75%
Frank Philp 0%
Mick Powers 14%
Paul Wayne Reese 83%
Delaine Roberts 0%
Ann Robinson 100%
Tony Ross 0%
John Schiffer 100%
Colin Simpson 67%
James Slater 0%
Bill Thompson 75%
Harry Tipton 86%
Bill Vasey 100%
Tom Walsh 100%
Jane Warren 100%
N. Jane Wostenberg 20%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top