Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Wyoming NARAL

2002 Positions

Issues: Abortion
State Office District Name Party Rating
WY State Senate 3 Curt Meier Republican 0%
WY State Senate 18 Henry Coe Republican 100%
WY State Senate 21 Bruce Burns Republican 83%
WY State Senate 23 Jeff Wasserburger Republican 71%
WY State Senate 25 Cale Case Republican 100%
WY State Senate 30 Charles Scott Republican 83%
WY State Board of Education Kathryn Sessions Democratic 43%
James Anderson 14%
Rodney Anderson 0%
Michael Baker 0%
Billie Barton 57%
Christopher Boswell 100%
Rich Cathcart 80%
Roy Cohee 25%
Ken Decaria 67%
Nick Deegan 0%
Irene Devin 83%
Ross Diercks 100%
David Edwards 100%
Richard Erb 0%
Floyd Esquibel 86%
John Eyre 14%
Gerald Gay 25%
Gerald Geis 0%
Keith Goodenough 100%
James Hageman 0%
John Hanes 86%
Mark Harris 100%
Bill Hawks 100%
Charles Hessenthaler 14%
Bruce Hinchey 50%
John Hines 0%
Roger Huckfeldt 50%
Jerry Iekel 0%
Pete Illoway 71%
Rae Lynn Job 100%
Lorna Johnson 100%
Wayne Johnson 100%
Tom Kinnison 100%
April Brimmer Kunz 0%
Jack Landon, Jr. 86%
Grant Larson 0%
Clarene Law 0%
Randall Luthi 50%
Mike Massie 100%
Mac McGraw 100%
George McMurtrey 60%
Del McOmie 60%
R. Larry Meuli 100%
Carroll Miller 40%
E. Jayne Mockler 100%
Layton Morgan 83%
Patricia Nagel 100%
George Nelson 0%
Philip Nicholas 57%
Douglas Osborn 75%
Fred Parady 75%
Carolyn Paseneaux 60%
Robert Peck 75%
Frank Philp 0%
Paul Wayne Reese 83%
Delaine Roberts 0%
Ann Robinson 100%
James Rose 75%
Tony Ross 0%
Dick Sadler 0%
Doug Samuelson 0%
John Schiffer 100%
Jim Shivler 43%
Marlene Simons 100%
Colin Simpson 100%
James Slater 0%
Rick Tempest 100%
Bill Thompson 71%
Harry Tipton 86%
Louie Tomassi 50%
Bill Vasey 100%
Jane Warren 100%
Loren Willford 100%
N. Jane Wostenberg 0%
Steven Youngbauer 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top