Rating Group: Christian Coalition of Florida

2009 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
FL U.S. House-5 Al Lawson, Jr. D 71%
FL U.S. House-9 Darren Soto D 64%
FL U.S. House-22 Ted Deutch D 64%
FL U.S. House-24 Frederica Wilson D 69%
FL Lieutenant Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera R 79%
FL State House-5 Brad Drake R 100%
FL State House-29 Scott Plakon R 100%
FL State House-52 Thad Altman R 71%
FL State House-81 Joseph Abruzzo D 57%
FL State House-99 Evan Jenne D 50%
FL State Senate-6 Audrey Gibson D 50%
FL State Senate-14 Dorothy Hukill R 100%
FL State Senate-17 Debbie Mayfield R 93%
FL State Senate-19 Darryl Rouson D 57%
FL State Senate-21 Bill Galvano R 79%
FL State Senate-22 Kelli Stargel R 100%
FL State Senate-26 Denise Grimsley R 86%
FL State Senate-29 Kevin Rader D 50%
FL State Senate-33 Perry Thurston, Jr. D 50%
FL State Senate-35 Oscar Braynon II D 57%
FL State Senate-39 Anitere Flores R 100%
FL Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Theo Patronis, Jr. R 93%
FL Mayor-At-Large Rick Kriseman 50%
FL Council Member-3 Lee Constantine 100%
FL Commissioner-1 Janet Long 57%
FL Commissioner-2 Victor Crist 100%
FL Commissioner-3 Charlie Justice 64%
FL Commissioner-5 Charles Chestnut IV 64%
FL Commissioner-13 Esteban Bovo, Jr. 79%
FL State Board of Education Tom Grady 79%
Sandy Adams 86%
Janet Adkins 100%
J.D. Alexander 79%
Kevin Ambler 79%
Tom Anderson 77%
Dave Aronberg 79%
Jeffrey Atwater 83%
Gary Aubuchon 79%
Carey Baker 100%
Leonard Bembry 100%
Michael Bennett 77%
Ellyn Bogdanoff 79%
Mary Brandenburg 57%
Ronald Brisé, Sr. 64%
Dwight Bullard 50%
Larcenia Bullard 70%
Rachel Burgin 100%
James Bush III 79%
Dean Cannon, Jr. 93%
Jennifer Carroll 79%
Gwyndolen Clarke-Reed 57%
Marti Coley 93%
Larry Cretul 83%
Steve Crisafulli 79%
Faye Culp 71%
Charles Dean, Sr. 71%
Nancy Detert 77%
Alex Diaz de la Portilla 71%
Paula Dockery 77%
Carl Domino 71%
Christopher Dorworth 100%
Eric Eisnaugle 100%
Greg Evers 100%
Mike Fasano 71%
Adam Fetterman 50%
Keith Fitzgerald 50%
Clay Ford 86%
Erik Fresen 79%
James Frishe 86%
Don Gaetz 93%
Luis Garcia, Jr. 64%
Rodolfo Garcia, Jr. 71%
Andy Gardiner 100%
Dan Gelber 86%
Joseph Gibbons 50%
Richard Glorioso 79%
Eddy Gonzalez 79%
Mike Haridopolos 71%
Adam Hasner 79%
Alan Hays 100%
Harold Heller 64%
Anthony Hill, Sr. 56%
Doug Holder 93%
Edward Homan, Jr. 77%
Ed Hooper 79%
Mike Horner 100%
Matt Hudson 93%
Dennis Jones 64%
Mia Jones 50%
Arthenia Joyner 69%
Kurt Kelly 100%
Martin Kiar 50%
Paige Kreegel 100%
John Legg 100%
Marcelo Llorente 79%
Evelyn Lynn 71%
Charles McBurney, Jr. 93%
Seth McKeel 93%
Dave Murzin 100%
Peter Nehr 77%
Bryan Nelson 100%
Stephen Oelrich 85%
Marlene O'Toole 79%
Mark Pafford 50%
Pat Patterson 86%
Durell Peaden, Jr. 100%
Juan-Carlos Planas 71%
Ralph Poppell 79%
Ari Abraham Porth 50%
Stephen Precourt 100%
Bill Proctor 86%
Ken Pruitt 71%
Scott Randolph 50%
Lake Ray III 100%
Ron Reagan 79%
Betty Reed 57%
Michelle Rehwinkel Vasilinda 50%
Doc Renuart, Sr. 100%
Nan Rich 64%
Garrett Richter 77%
Jeremy Ring 85%
David Rivera 85%
Julio Robaina 79%
Kenneth Roberson 93%
Yolly Roberson 50%
Hazelle Rogers 64%
Maria Sachs 57%
Franklin Sands 50%
Ray Sansom 89%
Ron Saunders 64%
Rob Schenck III 79%
Ron Schultz 71%
Elaine Schwartz 50%
Michael Scionti 64%
Gary Siplin 93%
Kelly Skidmore 50%
Christopher Smith 69%
William Snyder 93%
Eleanor Sobel 69%
Richard Steinberg 50%
Ronda Storms 100%
Dwayne Taylor 64%
Priscilla Ann Taylor 57%
Geraldine Thompson 57%
Nicholas Thompson 79%
John Tobia 79%
Baxter Troutman 79%
Charles Van Zant 100%
J. Alex Villalobos 75%
James Waldman 64%
William Weatherford 93%
Michael Weinstein 79%
Alan Williams 50%
Trudi Williams 79%
Stephen Wise 100%
John Wood 79%
Ritch Workman 79%
Juan Zapata 79%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »