Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Oklahoma Libertarian Party

2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
NA Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency E. Scott Pruitt Republican 40%
OK State House 82 Kevin Calvey Republican 60%
OK Commissioner 3 Ron Peters 40%
Dennis Adkins 30%
Jari Askins 30%
Thad Balkman 65%
Chris Benge 50%
Deborah Kay Blackburn 35%
David Braddock 40%
Bernest Cain, Jr. 40%
Gilmer Neely Capps 20%
Lance Cargill 60%
Bill Case 40%
Glenn Coffee 50%
Kenneth Corn 25%
James Covey 30%
Johnnie Crutchfield 20%
Odilia Dank 30%
Abe Deutschendorf 15%
Dale DeWitt 30%
Mary Easley 30%
Joe Eddins 5%
Ted Fisher 20%
Darrell Gilbert 25%
J. Berry Harrison 10%
Chris Hastings 25%
Todd Hiett 30%
Calvin Jackson Hobson III 25%
Terry Ingmire 30%
Mike Johnson 25%
Tad Jones 50%
Robert Mark Kerr 20%
Owen Laughlin 50%
Al Lindley 30%
Mark Liotta 40%
Michael Mass 30%
Raymond Gene McCarter 15%
Doug Miller 50%
Ray Miller 25%
Fred Samuel Morgan 35%
Mike Morgan 20%
John Nance 50%
Bill Nations 40%
Jim Newport 20%
Jonathan Nichols 45%
Fred Perry 30%
Ron Peterson 50%
Greg Piatt 40%
Bob Plunk 30%
Jeff Rabon 20%
Jim Reynolds 50%
Nancy Riley 45%
Paul Roan 30%
Curt Roggow 40%
Franklin David Shurden 75%
John Smaligo, Jr. 40%
Barbara Annette Staggs 40%
Kris Steele 45%
Joe Loyd Sweeden 20%
Stratton Taylor 25%
Sue Tibbs 40%
Opio Toure 50%
Dale Turner 30%
Purcy Walker 20%
Kathleen Wilcoxson 50%
James Williamson 25%
Jim Wilson 40%
Mike Wilt 55%
Susan Winchester 50%
John Wright 60%
Ray Young 30%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top