Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Northern Plains Resource Council

1999 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
ID State Senate 2 Steve Vick Republican 22%
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 55%
MT State Senate 5 Bob Keenan Republican 73%
MT State Senate 16 Frank Smith Democratic 89%
MT State Senate 44 Fred Thomas Republican 9%
MT State Senate 50 Tom Facey Democratic 89%
Darrel Adams 22%
Joan Andersen 33%
Tom Beck 9%
Dorothy Berry 20%
Al Bishop 64%
Rodney Bitney 33%
John Bohlinger 45%
Sylvia Bookout-Reinicke 44%
Roy Brown 44%
Rosalie Buzzas 78%
B. F. Christiaens 100%
Edith Clark 44%
Paul Clark 89%
Vicki Cocchiarella 82%
Mack Cole 18%
William Crismore 9%
Aubyn Curtiss 33%
Richard Dale 25%
Bob Davies 22%
Thomas Dell 89%
Robert DePratu 27%
Steve Doherty 100%
Bill Eggers 100%
E. P. Ekegren 9%
Jon Ellingson 91%
Alvin Ellis, Jr. 18%
Ron Erickson 89%
Stanley Fisher 29%
Eve Franklin 100%
Daniel Clint Fuchs 33%
Steven Gallus 78%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 89%
Kim Gillan 100%
William Glaser 27%
George Golie 89%
Duane Grimes 18%
Lorents Grosfield 18%
Gail Gutsche 89%
Richard Haines 33%
Mike Halligan 91%
Don Hargrove 9%
Donald Hedges 33%
Linda Holden 56%
Ric Holden 9%
Joan Hurdle 100%
Verdell Jackson 33%
Greg Jergeson 100%
Carol Juneau 89%
Dave Kasten 11%
Bob Lawson 56%
Ralph Lenhart 89%
Monica Lindeen 89%
Dale Mahlum 36%
Jeff Mangan 100%
Gay Ann Masolo 22%
Gary Matthews 44%
Matt McCann 67%
Bea McCarthy 45%
Daniel McGee 22%
Joe McKenney 44%
Walter McNutt 18%
Ken Miller 18%
Arnie Mohl 9%
Doug Mood 22%
Linda Nelson 64%
Mark Noennig 33%
Glenn Roush 45%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Jim Shockley 67%
Elaine Sliter 44%
Roger Somerville 33%
Mike Sprague 18%
Robert Story, Jr. 11%
Mike Taylor 27%
William Thomas 44%
Joseph Tropila 89%
Allan Walters 22%
Mignon Waterman 91%
Jack Wells 22%
John Witt 22%
Cindy Younkin 44%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top