Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Organization for Women

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Earl Pomeroy 73%
Jon Porter, Sr. 9%
Tom Price 9%
Deborah Pryce 23%
Mark Pryor 74%
Adam Putnam 5%
George Radanovich 10%
Nick Rahall II 59%
James Ramstad 41%
Charlie Rangel 95%
Ralph Regula 14%
Denny Rehberg 9%
Harry Reid 87%
Richard Renzi 18%
Silvestre Reyes 75%
Thomas Reynolds 5%
Jay Rockefeller IV 85%
Mike Rogers 5%
Mike Ross 59%
Steve Rothman 84%
John Salazar 67%
Ken Salazar 77%
Loretta Sanchez 95%
Jim Saxton 18%
Jean Schmidt 7%
Allyson Schwartz 86%
John Shadegg 10%
Christopher Shays 57%
Ike Skelton 52%
Gordon Smith 22%
Olympia Snowe 57%
Vic Snyder 77%
Mark Souder 9%
Arlen Specter 55%
John Spratt, Jr. 77%
Pete Stark 95%
Cliff Stearns 9%
Ted Stevens 13%
Bart Stupak 73%
John Sullivan 5%
John Sununu 14%
Tom Tancredo 10%
John Tanner 59%
Ellen Tauscher 91%
Gene Taylor 43%
Lee Terry 5%
Todd Tiahrt 9%
John Tierney 95%
Ed Towns 84%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 95%
Mark Udall 91%
David Vitter 9%
George Voinovich 9%
James Walsh 10%
Zach Wamp 5%
John Warner 13%
Diane Watson 90%
Mel Watt 95%
Henry Waxman 95%
Anthony Weiner 95%
David Weldon 5%
Gerald Weller 14%
Lynn Westmoreland 5%
Robert Wexler 100%
Ed Whitfield 5%
Heather Wilson 35%
Frank Wolf 9%
Lynn Woolsey 95%
David Wu 86%
Albert Wynn 86%
Bill Young 5%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top