Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Americans for the Arts Action Fund

2010 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Thaddeus McCotter 33%
Jim McDermott 100%
Mike McIntyre 17%
Michael McMahon 33%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 0%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 0%
John Mica 0%
Mike Michaud 83%
Barbara Mikulski 75%
Candice Miller 0%
Jeff Miller 0%
Brad Miller 83%
Walt Minnick 33%
Harry Mitchell 17%
Alan Mollohan 0%
Dennis Moore 83%
Jim Moran, Jr. 17%
Patrick Murphy 17%
Scott Murphy 0%
Tim Murphy 0%
Sue Myrick 0%
Ben Nelson 61%
Randy Neugebauer 0%
Glenn Nye III 17%
Jim Oberstar 33%
Dave Obey 0%
John Olver 17%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 17%
Bill Owens 0%
Ed Pastor 17%
Ron Paul 17%
Donald Payne 33%
Tom Perriello 17%
Tom Petri 0%
Pedro Pierluisi 17%
Joe Pitts 0%
Todd Platts 83%
Earl Pomeroy 17%
Tom Price 0%
Mark Pryor 55%
Adam Putnam 0%
Nick Rahall II 100%
Charlie Rangel 67%
Denny Rehberg 0%
Harry Reid 88%
Silvestre Reyes 17%
Jay Rockefeller IV 92%
Ciro Rodriguez 17%
Mike Rogers 0%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 33%
John Salazar 0%
Mark Schauer 17%
Jean Schmidt 0%
Aaron Schock 17%
Allyson Schwartz 17%
Jeff Sessions III 0%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 17%
John Shadegg 0%
Heath Shuler 0%
Ike Skelton 0%
Louise Slaughter 100%
Olympia Snowe 27%
Vic Snyder 17%
Arlen Specter 61%
John Spratt, Jr. 83%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Bart Stupak 0%
John Sullivan 0%
Betty Sutton 50%
John Tanner 17%
Gene Taylor 0%
Harry Teague 17%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
Pat Tiberi 17%
John Tierney 0%
Ed Towns 17%
Mark Udall 27%
David Vitter 0%
George Voinovich 27%
Zach Wamp 0%
Mel Watt 50%
Jim Webb, Jr. 61%
Anthony Weiner 33%
Lynn Westmoreland 0%
Ed Whitfield 0%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 0%
Frank Wolf 0%
David Wu 33%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top