Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Maryland State Education Association - NEA

1994 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
MD U.S. Senate Jr Chris Van Hollen, Jr. Democratic 100%
MD U.S. House 7 Elijah Cummings Democratic 100%
MD State House 17 Kumar Barve Democratic 100%
MD State House 22 Anne Healey Democratic 80%
MD State House 41 Samuel Rosenberg Democratic 100%
MD State House 43 Curt Anderson Democratic 100%
MD State House 43 Maggie McIntosh Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 1 George Edwards Republican 80%
MD State Senate 10 Delores Kelley Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 21 James Rosapepe Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 22 Paul Pinsky Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 24 Joanne Benson Democratic 80%
MD State Senate 27 Thomas Miller, Jr. Democratic 60%
MD Attorney General Brian Frosh Democratic 80%
MD Comptroller Peter Franchot Democratic 100%
MD Treasurer Nancy Kopp Democratic 100%
William Amoss 40%
John Arnick 60%
John Astle 50%
Walter Baker 25%
Joseph Bartenfelder 80%
Leon Billings 75%
John Bishop 60%
Phillip Bissett 50%
Clarence Blount 80%
Rose Mary Hatem Bonsack 75%
F. Vernon Boozer 40%
Frank Boston, Jr. 100%
Bennett Bozman 75%
Gerry Brewster 100%
Thomas Bromwell 60%
Mike Busch 100%
Joan Cadden 60%
John Cade 25%
James Campbell 100%
Michael Collins 80%
Mary Conroy 75%
Norman Conway 67%
David Craig 80%
Gerald Curran 80%
Ulysses Currie 100%
Clarence Davis 100%
George Della, Jr. 100%
Dana Lee Dembrow 80%
John Derr 60%
Thomas Dewberry 75%
Anthony DiPietro, Jr. 80%
Richard Dixon 50%
John Donoghue 80%
Ann Marie Doory 100%
Arthur Dorman 40%
Cornell Dypski 80%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 60%
Donald Elliott 40%
Nathaniel Exum 67%
Bob Flanagan 25%
Jennie Forehand 100%
Donald Fry 60%
Tony Edward Fulton 100%
Gilbert Genn 100%
Michael Gordon 100%
Leo Green 60%
Ronald Guns 33%
John Hafer 75%
Larry Haines 25%
James Michael Harkins 50%
Hattie Harrison 100%
Thomas Hattery 100%
Henry Heller 100%
Sheila Hixson 100%
Barbara Hoffman 50%
Paula Colodny Hollinger 100%
Carolyn Howard 100%
James Hubbard 100%
Brenda Bethea Hughes 80%
Ralph Hughes 80%
John Adams Hurson 100%
John Jefferies 100%
Philip Jimeno 100%
Wade Kach 50%
Kevin Kelly 80%
Ruth Kirk 100%
Robert Kittleman 20%
Martha Scanlan Klima 40%
Carolyn Krysiak 100%
Richard LaVay 67%
Gloria Gary Lawlah 100%
Ted Levin 40%
George Hayes Littrell, Jr. 75%
Mary Ann Love 80%
Martin Gerard Madden 80%
Salima Siler Marriott 100%
Christopher McCabe 50%
Charles McClenahan 50%
Brian McHale 100%
Pauline Menes 100%
Kenneth Charles Montague, Jr. 100%
John Stephen Morgan 80%
Donald Munson 40%
Margaret Murphy 100%
Ethel Murray 50%
George Owings III 80%
Richard Palumbo 100%
Marsha Perry 100%
Carol Stoker Petzold 100%
John Pica Jr. 100%
Joan Breslin Pitkin 100%
D. Bruce Poole 60%
James Ports, Jr. 40%
Mary Louise Preis 100%
James Proctor, Jr. 100%
Howard Peters Rawlings 75%
Alfred Redmer, Jr. 40%
Jean Roesser 60%
Ida Ruben 100%
Ellen Sauerbrey 25%
Kenneth Schisler 40%
John Frank Slade III 80%
Ted Sophocleus 80%
J. Lowell Stoltzfus 50%
Norman Stone, Jr. 75%
J. Anita Stup 60%
Victor Sulin 80%
Casper Taylor, Jr. 100%
Leonard Teitelbaum 100%
Robert Thornton, Jr. 80%
Decatur Trotter 80%
David Mercado Valderrama 100%
Joseph Vallario, Jr. 80%
Michael Weir, Jr. 50%
John Wood, Jr. 80%
Betty Workman 100%
Larry Young 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top