Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Ohio Christian Alliance

2000 Positions on Conservative Issues

Issues: Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
OH U.S. House 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic 75%
OH U.S. House 4 Jim Jordan Republican 60%
OH U.S. House 5 Bob Latta Republican 40%
OH State House 24 James Hughes Republican 60%
OH State House 27 Tom Brinkman, Jr. Republican 60%
OH State House 30 William Seitz Republican 60%
OH State House 39 Fred Strahorn Democratic 0%
OH State House 45 Teresa Fedor Democratic 20%
OH State House 59 John Boccieri Democratic 40%
OH State House 61 Ronald Young Republican 60%
OH State House 77 Tim Schaffer Republican 50%
OH State House 84 Keith Faber Republican 50%
OH Secretary of State Jon Husted Republican 50%
OH Commissioner At-Large Anthony Core 40%
Dixie Allen 50%
Ron Amstutz 40%
Steve Austria 50%
Charles Blasdel II 60%
Stephen Buehrer 40%
James Callender 50%
Charles Calvert 50%
John Carey, Jr. 33%
James Carmichael 50%
Jim Carnes 33%
Gary Cates 60%
Mary Cirelli 33%
L. George Distel 50%
David Evans 40%
Diana Fessler 60%
Bryan Flannery 50%
Larry Flowers 60%
Michael Gilb 50%
Timothy Grendell 60%
John Hagan 50%
William Hartnett 40%
James Hoops 33%
Jeff Jacobson 40%
Ed Jerse 75%
Peter Lawson Jones 40%
Annie Key 25%
K. Eileen Krupinski 40%
Anthony Latell, Jr. 40%
John Lendrum 33%
I. Miller, Jr. 40%
Larry Mumper 25%
Scott Nein 33%
Thomas Niehaus 50%
Lynn Olman 75%
Robert Otterman 50%
Sylvester Patton, Jr. 40%
Jon Peterson 0%
Tom Raga 50%
Chris Redfern 25%
Linda Reidelbach 60%
Steve Reinhard 33%
Twyla Roman 50%
Jean Schmidt 60%
Michelle Schneider 50%
Derrick Seaver 40%
Arlene Setzer 40%
Shirley Smith 50%
Robert Spada 60%
Erin Sullivan 20%
Joe Sulzer, Sr. 50%
Barbara Ann Sykes 25%
James Trakas 40%
Shawn Webster 60%
Doug White 40%
John Willamowski 50%
Bryan Williams 50%
Larry Wolpert 50%
Ann Womer-Benjamin 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top