Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Montana Stockgrowers Association

1997 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
ID State Senate 2 Steve Vick Republican 90%
MT State Senate 44 Fred Thomas Republican 100%
Darrel Adams 80%
Chris Marie Ahner 90%
Shiell Anderson 100%
Joseph Barnett 100%
Beverly Barnhart 70%
Sue Bartlett 70%
Tom Beck 100%
Ernest Bergsagel 70%
Al Bishop 50%
Rodney Bitney 100%
Sylvia Bookout-Reinicke 100%
Matt Brainard 70%
B. F. Christiaens 90%
Robert Clark 100%
John Cobb 90%
Mack Cole 90%
Bruce Crippen 90%
William Crismore 100%
Aubyn Curtiss 90%
Robert DePratu 100%
Gerry Devlin 100%
Steve Doherty 60%
Dorothy Eck 50%
David Ewer 60%
Eve Franklin 89%
Kim Gillan 70%
William Glaser 78%
Lorents Grosfield 100%
Antoinette Hagener 60%
Mike Halligan 90%
Marian Hanson 100%
Don Hargrove 100%
John Harp 100%
Hal Harper 60%
Dan Harrington 56%
John Hertel 100%
Chase Hibbard 90%
Ric Holden 100%
Joan Hurdle 60%
Reiny Jabs 100%
Greg Jergeson 80%
Royal Johnson 80%
Rick Jore 40%
Betty Lou Kasten 80%
Thomas Keating 70%
Sam Kitzenberg 80%
Billie Krenzler 50%
Bob Lawson 90%
John Lynch 90%
Dale Mahlum 100%
Gay Ann Masolo 100%
Matt McCann 90%
Bea McCarthy 80%
Linda McCulloch 70%
Daniel McGee 70%
Walter McNutt 100%
William Menahan 70%
John Mercer 100%
Kenneth Lee Mesaros 100%
Ken Miller 70%
Arnie Mohl 100%
Brad Molnar 60%
Doug Mood 100%
Linda Nelson 80%
Karl Ohs 100%
Scott James Orr 70%
Robert Pavlovich 78%
Ray Peck 60%
Joe Quilici 60%
Bob Raney 70%
William Rehbein, Jr. 100%
John Rose 100%
Trudi Schmidt 67%
Bruce Simon 89%
Paul Sliter 100%
Loren Soft 80%
Mike Sprague 90%
Carolyn Squires 60%
Barry Stang 67%
Emily Stonington 80%
Robert Story, Jr. 100%
Jay Stovall 90%
Charles Swysgood 100%
Bill Tash 100%
Lila Taylor 100%
Mike Taylor 100%
Daryl Toews 56%
Cliff Trexler 100%
Joseph Tropila 70%
Carley Tuss 60%
Douglas Wagner 50%
Allan Walters 90%
Mignon Waterman 70%
Bill Wilson 70%
Diana E. Wyatt 70%
Tom Zook 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top