Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Wisconsin Professional Police Association

2005-2006 Positions on Workplace Rights

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House 2 Mark Pocan Democratic 81%
WI U.S. House 6 Glenn Grothman Republican 87%
WI State Assembly 11 Jason Fields Democratic 90%
WI State Assembly 20 Christine Sinicki Democratic 89%
WI State Assembly 36 Jeffrey Mursau Republican 76%
WI State Assembly 41 Joan Ballweg Republican 80%
WI State Assembly 46 Gary Hebl Democratic 84%
WI State Assembly 61 Samantha Kerkman Republican 80%
WI State Assembly 63 Robin Vos Republican 80%
WI State Assembly 80 Sondy Pope Democratic 67%
WI State Senate 2 Robert Cowles Republican 93%
WI State Senate 3 Timothy Carpenter Democratic 93%
WI State Senate 4 Lena Taylor Democratic 93%
WI State Senate 8 Alberta Darling Republican 87%
WI State Senate 11 Stephen Nass Republican 90%
WI State Senate 13 Scott Fitzgerald Republican 93%
WI State Senate 14 Luther Olsen Republican 93%
WI State Senate 16 Mark Miller Democratic 87%
WI State Senate 22 Bob Wirch Democratic 93%
WI State Senate 26 Fred Risser Democratic 87%
WI State Senate 27 Jon Erpenbach Democratic 93%
WI State Senate 29 Jerry Petrowski Republican 81%
WI State Senate 30 Dave Hansen Democratic 93%
WI State Senate 32 Jennifer Shilling Democratic 81%
WI Supervisor 3 Sheldon Wasserman 90%
WI Supervisor 16 John Ainsworth 84%
WI Supervisor 17 Tony Staskunas 86%
Sheryl Albers 76%
Chuck Benedict 90%
Terese Berceau 90%
Garey Bies 76%
Spencer Black 86%
Frank Boyle 86%
Roger Breske 93%
Ron Brown 93%
G. Spencer Coggs 93%
Pedro Colon 81%
David Cullen 90%
Brett Davis 76%
Russell Decker 93%
Michael Ellis 86%
Jeff Fitzgerald 67%
Stephen Freese 81%
Donald Friske 71%
John Gard 76%
Curt Gielow 67%
Mark Gottlieb 67%
Tamara Grigsby 90%
Barbara Gronemus 90%
Scott Gunderson 71%
Mark Gundrum 67%
Eugene Hahn 76%
Sheila Harsdorf 93%
J.A. Hines 68%
Mark Honadel 71%
Mary Hubler 86%
Michael Huebsch 76%
Jean Hundertmark 71%
Robert Jauch 93%
Scott Richard Jensen 74%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 71%
Theodore Kanavas 87%
Dan Kapanke 93%
Dean Kaufert 76%
Neal Kedzie 87%
Frederick Kessler 75%
Steven Kestell 67%
Joel Kleefisch 81%
Judy Krawczyk 86%
Robin Kreibich 95%
James Kreuser 90%
Margaret Krusick 90%
Andy Lamb 76%
Alan Lasee 87%
Frank Lasee 86%
Julie Lassa 93%
Mary Lazich 87%
John Lehman 81%
Joseph Leibham 87%
Daniel LeMahieu 70%
Gabe Loeffelholz 75%
Thomas Lothian 80%
Terri McCormick 75%
Dan Meyer 81%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 76%
Phil Montgomery 67%
Terry Moulton 71%
Terry Musser 71%
Tom Nelson 75%
Lee Nerison 79%
Scott Newcomer 71%
Ann Nischke 76%
Alvin Ott 86%
Carol Owens 76%
Joseph Parisi 85%
Mark Pettis 81%
Jeffrey Plale 87%
Don Pridemore 71%
Tom Reynolds 80%
Kitty Rhoades 86%
Jon Richards 90%
Judith Robson 93%
Carol Roessler 93%
Marlin Schneider 90%
Dale Schultz 87%
Donna Seidel 95%
Mike Sheridan 95%
Gary Sherman 90%
John Steinbrink 81%
Cathy Stepp 87%
Jeffrey Stone 67%
Pat Strachota 76%
Scott Suder 80%
Barbara Toles 71%
Debra Towns 71%
John Townsend 80%
David Travis 95%
Robert Turner 76%
Gregg Underheim 81%
Terry Van Akkeren 81%
Karl Van Roy 76%
Daniel Vrakas 79%
Amy Vruwink 76%
Leah Vukmir 86%
David Ward 71%
Steve Wieckert 71%
Annette Williams 81%
Mary Williams 86%
Jeffrey Wood 80%
Leon Young 89%
Josh Zepnick 85%
Robert Ziegelbauer 86%
David Zien 87%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top