Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Humane Voters League

2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. Senate Jr Cory Gardner Republican 57%
CO State House 16 Larry Liston Republican 83%
CO State Senate 1 Jerry Sonnenberg Republican 67%
CO State Senate 6 Ellen Roberts Republican 71%
CO State Senate 9 Kent Lambert Republican 67%
CO State Senate 11 Michael Merrifield Democratic 100%
CO State Senate 12 Bob Gardner Republican 71%
CO State Senate 14 John Kefalas Democratic 100%
CO State Senate 22 Andy Kerr Democratic 100%
CO State Senate 28 Nancy Todd Democratic 100%
CO Council Member 1 Rafael Espinoza 100%
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen 91%
CO Commissioner At-Large Dan Gibbs 100%
Bob Bacon 100%
David Balmer 83%
Debbie Benefield 100%
Betty Boyd 100%
Greg Brophy 82%
Bill Cadman 83%
Terrance Carroll 100%
Edward Casso 100%
Kathleen Curry 92%
Mark Ferrandino 100%
Randy Fischer 92%
K. Jerry Frangas 100%
Sara Gagliardi 100%
Ted Harvey 92%
James Isgar 100%
Joel Judd 100%
Maryanne Keller 100%
James Kerr 71%
Kenneth Kester 100%
Steven King 83%
Mike Kopp 100%
Jeanne Labuda 100%
Claire Levy 100%
Marsha Looper 83%
Don Marostica 100%
Thomas Massey, Jr. 75%
Michael May 67%
Wes McKinley 55%
Frank McNulty 92%
Karen Middleton 100%
Shawn Mitchell 100%
John Morse 100%
Cherylin Peniston 100%
Joshua Penry 100%
John Pommer 100%
Dianne Primavera 100%
Scott Renfroe 80%
Joe Rice 100%
James Riesberg 100%
Chris Romer 100%
Christine Scanlan 92%
David Schultheis 83%
Gail Schwartz 100%
Brandon Shaffer 100%
Judy Solano 92%
John Soper 100%
Nancy Spence 100%
Amy Stephens 71%
Kenneth Guy Summers 71%
Spencer Swalm 83%
Abel Tapia 100%
Lois Tochtrop 100%
Glenn Vaad 100%
Jennifer Veiga 100%
Paul Weissmann 71%
Suzanne Williams 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top