Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Humane Voters League

2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 33%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 86%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 60%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 57%
Norma Anderson 25%
John Andrews 50%
Ken Arnold 57%
Gayle Berry 29%
Alice Borodkin 50%
Betty Boyd 38%
Bill Cadman 71%
Bruce Cairns 33%
Ken Chlouber 50%
Lauri Clapp 33%
Mark Alan Cloer 63%
Fran Coleman 100%
Bill Crane 0%
Richard Decker 57%
F. Jim Dyer 38%
Lewis Entz 63%
John Evans 40%
Rob Fairbank 75%
Joan Fitz-Gerald 100%
Timothy Fritz 100%
Michael Garcia 70%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 78%
Peter Groff 100%
Daniel Grossman 100%
Bob Hagedorn 83%
Deanna Hanna 89%
Ted Harvey 18%
Lynn Christian Hefley 50%
Mark Hillman 75%
Mary Hodge 100%
James Isgar 83%
Kenneth Kester 27%
Mark Larson 36%
Don Lee 30%
Douglas Linkhart 100%
Alice Madden 36%
Rosemary Marshall 100%
Ronny May 40%
Andrew McElhany 100%
Carl Miller 50%
Alice Nichol 100%
David Owen 100%
Terry Phillips 100%
Tom Plant 20%
Ann Ragsdale 100%
Peggy Reeves 75%
Pamela Rhodes 43%
Gregg Rippy 42%
Andrew Romanoff 100%
David Schultheis 57%
William Sinclair 86%
Matt Smith 38%
Nancy Spence 43%
Lola Spradley 89%
Debbie Stafford 50%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 88%
Stephanie Takis 100%
Abel Tapia 57%
Jack Taylor 50%
Ronald Teck 50%
Lois Tochtrop 100%
Jennifer Veiga 86%
Frank Weddig 57%
Albert White 27%
Suzanne Williams 88%
Tambor Williams 43%
Sue Windels 100%
John Witwer 25%
Bradley Young 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top