Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Humane Voters League

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 100%
CO State Senate 11 Michael Merrifield Democratic 100%
CO State Senate 15 Kevin Lundberg Republican 0%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 100%
CO Council Member 1 Rafael Espinoza 67%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 100%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 100%
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen 100%
Norma Anderson 75%
Alice Borodkin 100%
Betty Boyd 50%
Greg Brophy 80%
Dorothy Butcher 100%
Bill Cadman 0%
Terrance Carroll 100%
Michael Cerbo 100%
Lauri Clapp 100%
Mark Alan Cloer 100%
Fran Coleman 100%
Bill Crane 100%
Richard Decker 100%
F. Jim Dyer 100%
Lewis Entz 67%
John Evans 67%
Joan Fitz-Gerald 100%
K. Jerry Frangas 100%
Michael Garcia 100%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 100%
Peter Groff 67%
Daniel Grossman 100%
Bob Hagedorn 100%
Dale Hall 100%
Deanna Hanna 100%
Ted Harvey 80%
Lynn Christian Hefley 100%
Mark Hillman 100%
Mary Hodge 80%
Diane Hoppe 83%
James Isgar 80%
Ed Jones 100%
Joel Judd 100%
Maryanne Keller 83%
Kenneth Kester 100%
Mark Larson 100%
Alice Madden 83%
Rosemary Marshall 100%
Michael May 67%
Ronny May 100%
Bob McCluskey, Jr. 100%
Andrew McElhany 100%
Anne McGihon 100%
David Owen 100%
Angie Paccione 100%
Tom Plant 100%
John Pommer 100%
Ann Ragsdale 100%
Andrew Romanoff 100%
Raymond Rose 80%
David Schultheis 0%
Debbie Stafford 100%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 75%
Stephanie Takis 67%
Abel Tapia 100%
Jack Taylor 80%
Ronald Teck 100%
Ron Tupa 100%
Jennifer Veiga 67%
Valentin Vigil 100%
Paul Weissmann 100%
James Welker 0%
Albert White 100%
Sue Windels 67%
John Witwer 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top