Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: United Auto Workers

1998 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
James Ramstad 8%
Charlie Rangel 90%
Ralph Regula 42%
Harry Reid 100%
Silvestre Reyes 92%
Bob Riley 17%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 100%
Charles Robb 90%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 92%
Timothy Roemer 83%
James Rogan 0%
William Roth, Jr. 20%
Steve Rothman 100%
Marge Roukema 17%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Matt Salmon 0%
Loretta Sanchez 100%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 75%
Rick Santorum 10%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Thomas Sawyer 83%
Jim Saxton 50%
Joe Scarborough 18%
Robert Schaffer 17%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 0%
Christopher Shays 25%
E.G. Shuster 9%
Norman Sisisky 100%
Joseph Skeen 17%
Ike Skelton 82%
Gordon Smith 10%
Nick Smith 42%
Bob Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 50%
Vic Snyder 75%
Mark Souder 27%
Arlen Specter 75%
Floyd Spence, Sr. 25%
John Spratt, Jr. 100%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 25%
Charles Stenholm 67%
Ted Stevens 30%
Ted Strickland 100%
Bob Stump 0%
Bart Stupak 92%
John Sununu 17%
James Talent 0%
John Tanner 64%
Ellen Tauscher 58%
William Tauzin II 0%
Charles Taylor 25%
Gene Taylor 45%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 0%
Fred Thompson 10%
Karen Thurman 92%
Strom Thurmond 0%
Todd Tiahrt 8%
John Tierney 100%
Robert Torricelli 89%
Ed Towns 91%
James Traficant, Jr. 91%
James Turner 75%
Bruce Vento 100%
James Walsh 42%
Zach Wamp 25%
John Warner 20%
Wesley Watkins 8%
Mel Watt 92%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 17%
Henry Waxman 100%
David Weldon 9%
W. Curtis Weldon 50%
Gerald Weller 33%
Paul Wellstone 100%
Robert Wexler 100%
Bob Weygand 100%
Ed Whitfield 25%
Heather Wilson 29%
Bob Wise, Jr. 91%
Frank Wolf 25%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
Albert Wynn 100%
Bill Young 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top