Rating Group: California Republican Assembly

2001 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-4 Tom McClintock R 89%
CA U.S. House-14 Jackie Speier D 5%
CA U.S. House-27 Judy Chu D 3%
CA U.S. House-46 Lou Correa D 25%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 3%
CA U.S. House-51 Juan Vargas D 5%
CA State Senate-19 Hannah-Beth Jackson D 3%
CA State Senate-36 Pat Bates R 90%
CA Mayor-At-Large Darrell Steinberg D 3%
CA Supervisor-3 Wilma Chan 5%
CA Supervisor-3 Sheila Kuehl 0%
CA Supervisor-5 Bruce McPherson 24%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian N/A 3%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 23%
CA Council Member-5 Paul Koretz 0%
CA Council Member-10 Herb Wesson, Jr. 3%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 0%
Samuel Aanestad 95%
Richard Ackerman 100%
Richard Alarcón 0%
Deirdre Alpert 0%
Roy Ashburn 95%
James Battin 89%
Russell Bogh 92%
Debra Bowen 0%
James Brulte 97%
John Burton 3%
John Campbell III 88%
Joseph Canciamilla 3%
Edward Chavez 3%
Wesley Chesbro 3%
David Cogdill 93%
Rebecca Cohn 8%
Ellen Corbett 3%
Dave Cox 98%
Lynn Daucher 75%
Manny Diaz 3%
Joe Dunn 5%
John Anthony Dutra 3%
Martha Escutia 8%
Liz Figueroa 3%
Marco Antonio Firebaugh 5%
Dean Florez 45%
Dario Frommer 13%
Jackie Goldberg 0%
Tom Harman 85%
Ray Haynes, Jr. 97%
Dennis Hollingsworth 100%
Jerome Horton 8%
Ross Johnson 84%
Betty Karnette 5%
Christine Kehoe 0%
William Knight 89%
Jay La Suer 98%
Robert Leslie 93%
Carol Liu 3%
John Longville 0%
Michael Machado 26%
Ken Maddox 90%
Abel Maldonado 58%
Bob Margett 76%
Barbara Matthews 33%
William Phillip Morrow 84%
Dennis Lee Mountjoy 100%
Kevin Murray 3%
George Nakano 13%
Joseph Nation 3%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 13%
Thomas Oller 95%
Jenny Oropeza 3%
Deborah Ortiz 5%
Robert Pacheco 80%
Fran Pavley 3%
Don Perata 5%
Charles Poochigian 92%
Sarah Reyes 35%
Keith Stuart Richman 55%
Gloria Romero 0%
Simón Salinas 13%
Jack Scott 3%
Byron Sher 5%
Nell Soto 8%
Tony Strickland 95%
John Vasconcellos 5%
Edward Vincent 3%
Patricia Wiggins 0%
Mark Wyland 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.