Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: South Dakota Shooting Sports Association

2004 Lifetime Score

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
SD Lieutenant Governor Matt Michels Republican A-
SD State House 18 Jean Hunhoff Republican B+
SD State House 21 Julie Bartling Democratic B
SD State House 24 Tim Rounds Republican A
SD State House 29 Larry Rhoden Republican A+
SD State Senate 2 Brock Greenfield Republican A
SD State Senate 3 Al Novstrup Republican B+
SD Commissioner At-Large Dick Kelly B+
SD Commissioner At-Large Jim Lintz A+
SD Commissioner At-Large Duane Sutton A-
Gene Abdallah A
Stanford Adelstein F
Jerry Apa A
Eric Bogue A+
James Bradford B-
Michael Buckingham A
Quinten Burg B-
Daryl Christensen A-
Joni Cutler B+
Justin Davis B+
Thomas Deadrick A-
Thomas Dempster C
H. Dennert A
Jay Duenwald A+
J.P. Duniphan A
Joel Dykstra B-
William Earley A-
Burt Elliott A-
Richard Engels B+
Larry Frost A
Arthur Fryslie A
Cooper Garnos A
Margaret Gillespie A-
Mary Glenski A-
Tom Hackl B-
Gary Hanson B-
Dale Hargens B+
Jeffrey Haverly A+
Phyllis Heineman B
Thomas Hennies D
James Hundstad B
Ted Klaudt A+
Frank Kloucek A+
Gilbert Koetzle A-
Al Koistinen A
Clarence Kooistra A
John Koskan A+
Elizabeth Kraus A-
Michael Kroger B-
Gerald Lange B+
Michael LaPointe B+
Alice Lucille McCoy A+
Royal McCracken A+
Ed McLaughlin B
Kathleen Miles B
Garry Allen Moore A+
Casey Murschel B
William Napoli A+
Benjamin Nesselhuf A-
Sean O'Brien A-
Edwin Olson, Jr. A
Ryan Olson A-
Gordon Pederson A
Jim Peterson A
J.E. Putnam A+
Tim Rave B+
John Reedy B-
Donna Schafer B+
Lee Anton Schoenbeck A
Louis Sebert A
David Sigdestad A
Orville Smidt A
Daniel Sutton B+
William Thompson C-
Paul Valandra A-
Donald Van Etten A
Bill Van Gerpen B-
Thomas Van Norman A-
Keri Weems A-
Hal Wick B+

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top