Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Gun Owners of America

2010 Congressional Ratings on Gun Rights [04/2010]

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
Don Manzullo 91%
Jim Marshall 73%
Jim Matheson 55%
Carolyn McCarthy 9%
Thaddeus McCotter 91%
Jim McDermott 18%
Mike McIntyre 82%
Buck McKeon 82%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 9%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 55%
John Mica 64%
Mike Michaud 55%
Barbara Mikulski 18%
Candice Miller 91%
Gary Miller 82%
George Miller 18%
Jeff Miller 91%
Brad Miller 9%
Harry Mitchell 55%
Alan Mollohan 45%
Dennis Moore 18%
Jim Moran, Jr. 9%
Patrick Murphy 9%
Tim Murphy 91%
Sue Myrick 91%
Ben Nelson 55%
Randy Neugebauer 91%
Jim Oberstar 27%
Dave Obey 18%
John Olver 9%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 36%
Ed Pastor 9%
Ron Paul 100%
Donald Payne 18%
Tom Petri 82%
Joe Pitts 82%
Todd Platts 91%
Earl Pomeroy 36%
Tom Price 91%
Mark Pryor 36%
Adam Putnam 82%
George Radanovich 82%
Nick Rahall II 36%
Charlie Rangel 18%
Denny Rehberg 91%
Harry Reid 18%
Silvestre Reyes 36%
Laura Richardson 18%
Jay Rockefeller IV 18%
Ciro Rodriguez 36%
Mike Rogers 82%
Mike Ross 64%
Steve Rothman 9%
John Salazar 36%
Ken Salazar 73%
Loretta Sanchez 18%
Jean Schmidt 91%
Aaron Schock 91%
Allyson Schwartz 9%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 9%
John Shadegg 82%
Heath Shuler 55%
Ike Skelton 55%
Olympia Snowe 18%
Vic Snyder 18%
Mark Souder 91%
Zack Space 55%
Arlen Specter 36%
John Spratt, Jr. 18%
Pete Stark 18%
Cliff Stearns 82%
Bart Stupak 64%
John Sullivan 82%
Betty Sutton 18%
John Tanner 55%
Ellen Tauscher 9%
Gene Taylor 55%
Lee Terry 73%
Todd Tiahrt 82%
John Tierney 9%
Ed Towns 18%
Mark Udall 18%
David Vitter 100%
George Voinovich 36%
Zach Wamp 73%
Diane Watson 9%
Mel Watt 9%
Henry Waxman 9%
Anthony Weiner 18%
Lynn Westmoreland 91%
Robert Wexler 9%
Ed Whitfield 91%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 55%
Frank Wolf 55%
Lynn Woolsey 9%
David Wu 18%
Bill Young 73%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top