State Office Name Party Rating
MS State House-10 Nolan Mettetal R 94%
MS State House-16 Stephen Holland D 35%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 19%
MS State House-31 Sara Thomas D 26%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 17%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 44%
MS State House-37 Gary Chism R 95%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 29%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 91%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 20%
MS State House-50 John Hines, Sr. D 15%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 18%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 25%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 96%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 90%
MS State House-62 Tom Weathersby, Sr. R 89%
MS State House-64 Bill Denny, Jr. R 95%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 18%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 40%
MS State House-76 Greg Holloway, Sr. D 29%
MS State House-80 Omeria Scott D 23%
MS State House-81 Stephen Horne R 45%
MS State House-83 Greg Snowden R 91%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 26%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 17%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 23%
MS State House-112 John Read R 85%
MS State House-113 Henry Zuber III R 78%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 89%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 27%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 28%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 28%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 81%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 14%
MS State Senate-25 J. Walter Michel R 97%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 17%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 22%
MS State Senate-30 Dean Kirby R 94%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 89%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 25%
MS State Senate-33 Videt Carmichael R 82%
MS State Senate-37 Bob Dearing D 85%
MS State Senate-41 Joey Fillingane R 88%
MS State Senate-48 Deborah Dawkins D 19%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 78%
Larry Baker 88%
Jim Barnett 82%
Leonard Bentz 95%
Billy Broomfield 26%
Cecil Brown 69%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 84%
Robert Chamberlin 63%
Mike Chaney 96%
Linda Coleman 27%
Mary Coleman 35%
Joseph Compretta 63%
Scottie Cuevas 81%
Ricky Cummings 50%
Lee Jarrell Davis 89%
Dirk Dedeaux 35%
Reecy Dickson 16%
Blaine Eaton II 35%
James Ellington 95%
Henry William Espy III 34%
James Evans 13%
George Flaggs, Jr. 35%
Erik Fleming 14%
Mark Formby 96%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 32%
Frances Fredericks 27%
Herbert Frierson 79%
Jack Gadd 69%
David Gibbs 26%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 89%
David Green 22%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 88%
Frank Hamilton 84%
Alice Harden 20%
Esther Harrison 22%
William Hewes III 90%
Bobby Howell 92%
Joe Hudson 82%
Cindy Hyde-Smith 91%
Roger Ishee 84%
Michael Janus 64%
Wanda Jennings 89%
Thomas King, Jr. 91%
Ezell Lee 79%
Travis Little 91%
Michael Lott 91%
Bennett Malone 48%
James Markham, Jr. 77%
Rita Martinson 93%
Chester Masterson, Sr. 85%
John Mayo 71%
Warner McBride 61%
William McCoy 41%
William Miles 77%
Robert Moak 24%
T.O. Moffatt 95%
B. Pat Montgomery 58%
E. Harvey Moss 48%
Billy Nicholson 85%
Alan Nunnelee 97%
Diane Peranich 32%
Randy Pierce 66%
Lynn Posey 53%
John Raymond Reeves 80%
Thomas Robertson 95%
Eric Robinson 90%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 21%
Charles Ross 95%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 90%
Bobby Shows 84%
James Simpson, Jr. 85%
Ferr Smith 23%
Clayton Smith 93%
Mary Stevens 43%
Johnny Stringer 64%
Bobby Taylor 53%
Billy Thames 40%
Bennie Turner 21%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 14%
Greg Ward 73%
Joseph Warren 51%
Carmen Wells-Smith 93%
Phillip West 24%
Richard White 97%
May Ringold Whittington 48%
Gloria Williamson 21%
Tommy Woods 93%
Charles Young, Sr. 44%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.