State Office Name Party Rating
MS State House-10 Nolan Mettetal R 71%
MS State House-16 Stephen Holland D 66%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 38%
MS State House-31 Sara Thomas D 49%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 30%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 54%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 34%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 74%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 27%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 23%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 39%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 87%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 73%
MS State House-62 Tom Weathersby, Sr. R 72%
MS State House-64 Bill Denny, Jr. R 91%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 27%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 39%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 29%
MS State House-94 Robert Johnson III D 41%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 36%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 15%
MS State House-112 John Read R 71%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 74%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 51%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 48%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 47%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 76%
MS State Senate-21 Barbara Blackmon D 28%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 17%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 21%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 19%
MS State Senate-30 Dean Kirby R 88%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 81%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 33%
MS State Senate-37 Bob Dearing D 74%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 65%
Jim Crawley Barnett 71%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 91%
William Bowles 62%
Billy Broomfield 35%
Thomas Cameron III 89%
William Ward Canon 94%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 89%
Neely Carlton 39%
Robert Clark, Jr. 46%
Linda Coleman 35%
Mary Coleman 65%
Joseph Compretta 67%
Scottie Cuevas 36%
Ricky Cummings 43%
Lee Jarrell Davis 80%
Dirk Dedeaux 43%
George Dickerson 47%
Reecy Dickson 29%
Blaine Eaton II 48%
James Ellington 93%
Joe Ellzey 76%
James Evans 16%
Ronald David Farris 73%
George Flaggs, Jr. 57%
Timothy Alan Ford 87%
Mark Formby 91%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 42%
Frances Fredericks 36%
Herbert Frierson 65%
Vernon Delma Furniss 21%
Jack Gadd 57%
David Gibbs 48%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 57%
David Green 32%
Joe Grist, Jr. 39%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 80%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 85%
Frank Hamilton 81%
Alice Harden 18%
Clayton Henderson 50%
William Hewes III 85%
Tommy Horne 19%
Bobby Howell 88%
Joe Hudson 53%
Roger Ishee 71%
Michael Janus 82%
Wanda Jennings 74%
Tim Johnson 84%
Andrew Ketchings 91%
Ezell Lee 48%
Travis Little 87%
R.L. Livingston 27%
Bennett Malone 37%
Percy Maples 68%
James Markham, Jr. 69%
Rita Martinson 83%
Warner McBride 83%
William McCoy 64%
William Miles 73%
William Minor 89%
Thomas Mitchell 73%
Robert Moak 28%
T.O. Moffatt 82%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 91%
Robert Moody 75%
E. Harvey Moss 44%
Clem Mullins Nettles 49%
Alan Nunnelee 78%
Diane Peranich 39%
Lynn Posey 60%
John Raymond Reeves 67%
Thomas Robertson 83%
Valeria Brower Robertson 84%
Eric Robinson 69%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 35%
Charles Ross 87%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 77%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 93%
Eloise Hale Scott 64%
Bobby Shows 79%
James Simpson, Jr. 91%
Charles Smith 85%
Ferr Smith 30%
Robert Harold Smith 38%
Mary Stevens 72%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 74%
Johnny Stringer 66%
Bobby Taylor 65%
Billy Thames 51%
Jimmy Thornton 23%
Bennie Turner 35%
Tom Wallace 52%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 18%
Joseph Warren 64%
Carmen Wells-Smith 83%
Phillip West 58%
John Robert White 26%
Richard White 93%
Tommy Woods 92%
Charles Young, Sr. 53%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.