Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Gerontological Society

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 33%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 100%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 38%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 100%
Norma Anderson 85%
John Andrews 50%
Ken Arnold 69%
Gayle Berry 38%
Alice Borodkin 100%
Betty Boyd 100%
Bill Cadman 17%
Bruce Cairns 23%
Ken Chlouber 85%
Lauri Clapp 63%
Mark Alan Cloer 63%
Fran Coleman 100%
Bill Crane 36%
Richard Decker 63%
F. Jim Dyer 69%
Lewis Entz 86%
John Evans 67%
Rob Fairbank 67%
Joan Fitz-Gerald 100%
Timothy Fritz 78%
Michael Garcia 100%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 100%
Peter Groff 100%
Daniel Grossman 100%
Bob Hagedorn 100%
Deanna Hanna 100%
Lynn Christian Hefley 63%
Mark Hillman 64%
Mary Hodge 89%
Diane Hoppe 75%
Kenneth Kester 78%
Mark Larson 89%
Don Lee 38%
Douglas Linkhart 100%
Alice Madden 100%
Rosemary Marshall 100%
Ronny May 31%
Andrew McElhany 38%
Carl Miller 100%
Shawn Mitchell 44%
Alice Nichol 92%
David Owen 64%
Terry Phillips 100%
Tom Plant 100%
Ann Ragsdale 88%
Peggy Reeves 100%
Pamela Rhodes 38%
Gregg Rippy 100%
Andrew Romanoff 100%
David Schultheis 27%
William Sinclair 55%
Matt Smith 100%
Nancy Spence 75%
Lola Spradley 63%
Debbie Stafford 38%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 63%
Stephanie Takis 100%
Abel Tapia 100%
Jack Taylor 92%
Ronald Teck 75%
Lois Tochtrop 100%
Ron Tupa 100%
Jennifer Veiga 100%
Valentin Vigil 100%
Frank Weddig 100%
Albert White 78%
Suzanne Williams 100%
Tambor Williams 38%
Sue Windels 100%
John Witwer 88%
Bradley Young 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top