Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Gerontological Society

2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 23%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 91%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 18%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 70%
Norma Anderson 69%
John Andrews 42%
Ken Arnold 54%
Gayle Berry 67%
Alice Borodkin 100%
Betty Boyd 100%
Bill Cadman 27%
Bruce Cairns 15%
Ken Chlouber 92%
Lauri Clapp 30%
Mark Alan Cloer 67%
Fran Coleman 91%
Bill Crane 64%
Richard Decker 64%
F. Jim Dyer 62%
Lewis Entz 77%
John Evans 64%
Rob Fairbank 45%
Joan Fitz-Gerald 100%
Timothy Fritz 50%
Michael Garcia 100%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 100%
Peter Groff 100%
Daniel Grossman 100%
Bob Hagedorn 100%
Deanna Hanna 100%
Ted Harvey 45%
Lynn Christian Hefley 45%
Mark Hillman 46%
Mary Hodge 100%
Diane Hoppe 40%
James Isgar 100%
Kenneth Kester 55%
Mark Larson 82%
Don Lee 27%
Douglas Linkhart 100%
Alice Madden 100%
Rosemary Marshall 100%
Ronny May 31%
Andrew McElhany 33%
Carl Miller 89%
Shawn Mitchell 36%
Alice Nichol 92%
David Owen 50%
Terry Phillips 100%
Tom Plant 100%
Ann Ragsdale 100%
Peggy Reeves 100%
Pamela Rhodes 36%
Gregg Rippy 55%
Andrew Romanoff 100%
David Schultheis 20%
William Sinclair 45%
Matt Smith 60%
Nancy Spence 55%
Lola Spradley 20%
Debbie Stafford 73%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 55%
Stephanie Takis 100%
Abel Tapia 100%
Jack Taylor 85%
Ronald Teck 77%
Lois Tochtrop 100%
Ron Tupa 100%
Jennifer Veiga 100%
Valentin Vigil 100%
Frank Weddig 91%
Albert White 64%
Suzanne Williams 100%
Tambor Williams 55%
Sue Windels 100%
John Witwer 64%
Bradley Young 55%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top