Rating Group: Environment North Carolina

2008 Lifetime Score

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
NC U.S. Senate-Jr Thom Tillis R 63%
NC U.S. House-12 Alma Adams D 89%
NC State House-13 Patricia McElraft R 67%
NC State House-14 George Cleveland R 36%
NC State House-21 Larry Bell, Sr. D 62%
NC State House-22 William Brisson R 80%
NC State House-24 Jean Farmer-Butterfield D 90%
NC State House-27 Michael Wray D 71%
NC State House-31 Mickey Michaux, Jr. D 76%
NC State House-34 Grier Martin D 97%
NC State House-36 Nelson Dollar R 51%
NC State House-42 Marvin Lucas, Jr. D 71%
NC State House-48 Garland Pierce D 72%
NC State House-53 David Lewis, Sr. R 59%
NC State House-56 Verla Insko D 100%
NC State House-57 Mary Harrison D 100%
NC State House-62 John Blust R 49%
NC State House-70 Patricia Hurley R 65%
NC State House-79 Julia Howard R 66%
NC State House-83 Linda Johnson R 69%
NC State House-89 Mitchell Setzer R 42%
NC State House-101 Beverly Earle D 63%
NC State House-102 Becky Carney D 72%
NC State House-107 Kelly Alexander, Jr. D 100%
NC State House-111 Timothy Moore R 44%
NC State House-114 Susan Fisher D 92%
NC State Senate-4 Angela Bryant D 95%
NC State Senate-6 Harry Brown R 46%
NC State Senate-14 Dan Blue, Jr. D 79%
NC State Senate-20 Floyd McKissick, Jr. D 95%
NC State Senate-26 Philip Berger, Sr. R 47%
NC State Senate-29 Jerry Tillman R 53%
NC State Senate-34 Andrew Brock R 47%
NC Treasurer Dale Folwell R 46%
Charles Albertson 83%
Martha Alexander 100%
Lucy Allen 69%
Austin Allran 62%
Thomas Apodaca 56%
Robert Atwater 83%
Marilyn Avila 55%
Jeffrey Barnhart 42%
Marc Basnight 69%
Douglas Berger 94%
Stan Bingham 66%
Curtis Blackwood, Jr. 38%
Harris Blake 53%
Alice Bordsen 80%
Julia Boseman 77%
Van Braxton 70%
Larry Brown 61%
Harold Brubaker 56%
Peter Brunstetter 47%
Debbie Clary 62%
Daniel Clodfelter 77%
Lorene Coates 73%
Nelson Cole 62%
Patricia Cotham 90%
James Crawford, Jr. 62%
Bill Current, Sr. 67%
Charlie Dannelly 72%
Leo Daughtry 46%
Margaret Dickson 74%
Jerry Dockham 49%
Katie Dorsett 79%
Don East 44%
Bob England 72%
Bill Faison 69%
Tony Foriest 80%
James Forrester 51%
Phillip Frye 28%
Linda Garrou 79%
Pryor Gibson III 72%
Mitch Gillespie 33%
Rick Glazier 89%
D. Goforth 54%
Eddie Goodall, Jr. 49%
Melanie Goodwin 85%
Steve Goss 75%
William Grady 66%
Malcolm Graham 86%
Jim Gulley 54%
Joe Hackney 100%
Robert Phillip Haire 82%
Larry Hall 96%
Ty Harrell 90%
Fletcher Hartsell, Jr. 66%
Dewey Hill 64%
Mark Hilton 36%
Hugh Holliman 74%
Bryan Holloway 33%
David Hoyle, Sr. 68%
Sandra Hughes 59%
Neal Hunt 69%
Jim Jacumin 55%
Margaret Jeffus 78%
Clark Jenkins 83%
Earl Jones 87%
Edward Jones 79%
Carolyn Justice 87%
Carolyn Justus 62%
Richard Killian 40%
Eleanor Kinnaird 100%
James Langdon, Jr. 36%
Jimmy Love, Sr. 65%
Paul Luebke 100%
Daniel McComas 62%
William McGee 59%
Marian McLawhorn 78%
Annie Mobley 85%
Martin Nesbitt, Jr. 86%
Wil Neumann IV 79%
William Owens, Jr. 54%
Earline Parmon 79%
Jean Preston 50%
William Purcell 78%
Joe Queen 66%
Anthony Rand 76%
Ray Rapp 85%
Deborah Ross 97%
Robert Rucho 53%
Ruth Samuelson 86%
Larry Shaw 72%
John Snow, Jr. 83%
Robert Soles, Jr. 75%
Timothy Spear 67%
Paul Stam, Jr. 64%
Edgar Starnes 53%
Fred Steen II 44%
Richard Stevens 67%
Bonner Stiller 67%
Ronnie Sutton 67%
Alvin Swindell IV 75%
Cullie Tarleton 83%
Joe Tolson 70%
Russell Tucker 72%
Alice Underhill 81%
William Wainwright 58%
Edith Warren 74%
Ray Warren 85%
David Weinstein 73%
Jennifer Weiss 100%
Roger West 28%
Laura Wiley 44%
W. Wilkins 67%
Arthur Williams III 62%
Larry Womble 81%
Douglas Yongue 73%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.