Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona League of Conservation Voters

2002 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
Carlos Avelar II 100%
William Brotherton 100%
Meg Burton Cahill 100%
Gabrielle Giffords 100%
Mary Hartley 100%
John Loredo 100%
Elaine Richardson 100%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 100%
Albert Tom 100%
Virginia Yrun 100%
Kathi Foster 97%
Leah Landrum Taylor 97%
Jay Blanchard 94%
Harry Mitchell 94%
Ramon Valadez 94%
Linda Lopez 93%
Christine Weason 93%
Henry Camarot 90%
Ken Cheuvront 90%
Bobby Lugo 90%
Debora Norris 90%
Marion Pickens 90%
Carmine Cardamone 83%
James Sedillo 83%
Victor Soltero 83%
Linda Aguirre 81%
Marsha Arzberger 81%
Chris Cummiskey 81%
Herb Guenther 81%
John Verkamp 81%
AZ Supervisor 2 Cheryl Chase 80%
Mark Clark 80%
Lori Daniels 75%
Ruth Solomon 75%
Sylvia Laughter 73%
AZ U.S. House 1 Tom O'Halleran Democratic 73%
Edward Cirillo 69%
Robert Cannell 67%
Jack Brown 63%
Susan Gerard 63%
Randall Gnant 63%
Jack Jackson, Sr. 63%
Mark Maiorana 63%
Edward Poelstra 60%
Ken Bennett 56%
David Petersen 56%
Tom Smith 56%
James Carruthers 53%
Brenda Burns 50%
Darden Hamilton 50%
Toni Hellon 50%
Dean Martin 50%
Steve May 50%
Timothy Bee 44%
Scott Bundgaard 44%
Deb Gullett 43%
Pete Hershberger 43%
Steve Huffman 37%
Wesley Marsh 37%
Carol Somers 37%
Ted Carpenter 33%
Jeff Hatch-Miller 33%
Barbara Leff 33%
Stephen Tully 33%
Roberta Voss 33%
Franklin Flake 30%
James Kraft 30%
Lowell Gleason 27%
Phil Hanson 27%
Laura Knaperek 27%
Marian Ann McClure 27%
John Nelson 27%
Linda Binder 23%
John Huppenthal 23%
Robert Blendu 20%
Linda Gray 20%
Jim Weiers 20%
Marilyn Jarrett 19%
Debra Brimhall 17%
Dean Cooley 17%
Bob Robson 17%
Mark Anderson 13%
Randy Graf 13%
Joe Eddie Lopez 13%
Russell Pearce 10%
Gary Pierce 10%
AZ State House 12 Eddie Farnsworth Republican 0%
Karen Johnson 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top