Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona League of Conservation Voters

2002 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
Linda Aguirre 81%
Mark Anderson 13%
Marsha Arzberger 81%
Carlos Avelar II 100%
Timothy Bee 44%
Ken Bennett 56%
Linda Binder 23%
Jay Blanchard 94%
Robert Blendu 20%
Debra Brimhall 17%
William Brotherton 100%
Jack Brown 63%
Scott Bundgaard 44%
Brenda Burns 50%
Meg Burton Cahill 100%
Henry Camarot 90%
Robert Cannell 67%
Carmine Cardamone 83%
Ted Carpenter 33%
James Carruthers 53%
AZ Supervisor 2 Cheryl Chase 80%
Ken Cheuvront 90%
Edward Cirillo 69%
Mark Clark 80%
Dean Cooley 17%
Chris Cummiskey 81%
Lori Daniels 75%
AZ State House 12 Eddie Farnsworth Republican 0%
Franklin Flake 30%
Kathi Foster 97%
Susan Gerard 63%
Gabrielle Giffords 100%
Lowell Gleason 27%
Randall Gnant 63%
Randy Graf 13%
Linda Gray 20%
Herb Guenther 81%
Deb Gullett 43%
Darden Hamilton 50%
Phil Hanson 27%
Mary Hartley 100%
Jeff Hatch-Miller 33%
Toni Hellon 50%
Pete Hershberger 43%
Steve Huffman 37%
John Huppenthal 23%
Jack Jackson, Sr. 63%
Marilyn Jarrett 19%
Karen Johnson 0%
Laura Knaperek 27%
James Kraft 30%
Leah Landrum Taylor 97%
Sylvia Laughter 73%
Barbara Leff 33%
Joe Eddie Lopez 13%
Linda Lopez 93%
John Loredo 100%
Bobby Lugo 90%
Mark Maiorana 63%
Wesley Marsh 37%
Dean Martin 50%
Steve May 50%
Marian Ann McClure 27%
Harry Mitchell 94%
John Nelson 27%
Debora Norris 90%
AZ U.S. House 1 Tom O'Halleran Democratic 73%
Russell Pearce 10%
David Petersen 56%
Marion Pickens 90%
Gary Pierce 10%
Edward Poelstra 60%
Elaine Richardson 100%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 100%
Bob Robson 17%
James Sedillo 83%
Tom Smith 56%
Ruth Solomon 75%
Victor Soltero 83%
Carol Somers 37%
Albert Tom 100%
Stephen Tully 33%
Ramon Valadez 94%
John Verkamp 81%
Roberta Voss 33%
Christine Weason 93%
Jim Weiers 20%
Virginia Yrun 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top