Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona League of Conservation Voters

2001 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
Meg Burton Cahill 100%
Carmine Cardamone 100%
Chris Cummiskey 100%
Gabrielle Giffords 100%
Mary Hartley 100%
John Loredo 100%
Debora Norris 100%
Elaine Richardson 100%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 100%
Ramon Valadez 100%
Christine Weason 100%
Harry Mitchell 92%
Joe Eddie Lopez 91%
Leah Landrum Taylor 89%
Ken Cheuvront 88%
James Sedillo 88%
John Verkamp 83%
Carlos Avelar II 78%
Kathi Foster 78%
Linda Lopez 78%
Marion Pickens 78%
Albert Tom 78%
William Brotherton 67%
Jack Jackson, Sr. 67%
Ruth Solomon 67%
Victor Soltero 67%
Virginia Yrun 67%
Mark Clark 63%
Susan Gerard 60%
Linda Aguirre 58%
Marsha Arzberger 58%
Jay Blanchard 58%
Carolyn Allen 56%
Henry Camarot 56%
Deb Gullett 56%
Jeff Hatch-Miller 56%
Pete Hershberger 56%
Jack Brown 50%
Robert Cannell 50%
Ted Carpenter 50%
AZ Supervisor 2 Cheryl Chase 50%
Herb Guenther 50%
Laura Knaperek 50%
Mark Maiorana 50%
James Carruthers 44%
Steve Huffman 44%
James Kraft 44%
Bobby Lugo 44%
Marian Ann McClure 44%
AZ U.S. House 1 Tom O'Halleran Democratic 44%
Carol Somers 44%
Scott Bundgaard 42%
Mark Anderson 38%
Dean Cooley 38%
Phil Hanson 38%
John Nelson 38%
Robert Blendu 33%
Brenda Burns 33%
Edward Cirillo 33%
Lowell Gleason 33%
Randall Gnant 33%
Barbara Leff 33%
Wesley Marsh 33%
Dean Martin 33%
David Petersen 33%
Roberta Voss 33%
Sylvia Laughter 29%
Steve May 29%
Darden Hamilton 27%
Timothy Bee 25%
Ken Bennett 25%
AZ State House 25 Rusty Bowers Republican 25%
Franklin Flake 25%
John Huppenthal 25%
Edward Poelstra 25%
Tom Smith 25%
Jim Weiers 25%
Marilyn Jarrett 22%
Lori Daniels 17%
Toni Hellon 17%
Bob Robson 14%
Linda Gray 13%
Stephen Tully 13%
Debra Brimhall 11%
AZ State House 12 Eddie Farnsworth Republican 11%
Karen Johnson 11%
Russell Pearce 11%
Linda Binder 0%
Randy Graf 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top