or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI)

1998 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 100%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. Republican 75%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 17%
LA State Senate 4 Edwin Murray Democratic 33%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 100%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 83%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 67%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 67%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 67%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 83%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 50%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. Democratic 25%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 50%
LA Insurance Commissioner James Donelon Republican 83%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 67%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. Democratic 0%
Rodney Alexander 83%
Glenn Ansardi 83%
Diana Bajoie 25%
Robert Barham 50%
Clara Baudoin 50%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 17%
Ronald Bean 100%
Shirley Bowler 100%
Michael Franklin Branch 100%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 67%
Emile Bruneau 83%
James Cain 33%
Robert Carter 50%
Thomas Casanova III 75%
Joel Chaisson II 67%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 100%
James Joseph Cox 0%
Carl Crane 100%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 25%
Israel Curtis 20%
N. J. Damico 100%
William Daniel IV 100%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 100%
John Dirk Deville 50%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 100%
John Diez 67%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 40%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 83%
Sydnie Mae Durand 83%
B.G. Dyess 67%
Noble Ellington 25%
Randy Ewing 50%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 83%
Cleo Fields 25%
Wilson Fields 0%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 83%
Heulette Fontenot 100%
Mickey Frith 83%
Gregory Lee Fruge 83%
Butch Gautreaux 67%
Cedric Bradford Glover 50%
Kyle Mark Green 17%
Elcie Guillory 33%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 75%
Alexander Heaton 50%
Troy Hebert 67%
Francis Heitmeier 25%
Herman Ray Hill 60%
Donald Hines 25%
Melvin Lee Holden 50%
Ken Hollis 50%
Roy Hopkins 100%
Charles Irvin Hudson 60%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 33%
Kay Iles 67%
Paulette Riley Irons 25%
Louis Jenkins 100%
Raymond Jetson 50%
Jon Johnson 50%
Charles Jones 25%
Donald Kennard 83%
Lelon Kenney 50%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 25%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 100%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 67%
Arthur Lentini 50%
Max Malone 100%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 100%
Jay Bowen McCallum 83%
Charles McDonald 67%
F. Charles McMains, Jr. 83%
Michael Michot 83%
Billy Montgomery 33%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 67%
Anthony Richard Perkins 100%
Wilfred Pierre 50%
Gillis Pinac 50%
Henry Powell 100%
Renee Gill Pratt 33%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 33%
Charles Riddle III 50%
Michael Robichaux 25%
Craig Romero 67%
Errol Romero 100%
Joe Salter 50%
Matthew Schneider III 100%
Melinda Schwegmann 50%
B.L. Shaw 50%
John Siracusa 67%
Jack Smith 67%
Kenneth Smith 50%
Victor Stelly 67%
Gerald Theunissen 100%
Jerry Thomas 83%
Tom Thornhill 83%
Joseph Toomy 50%
John Travis 50%
Warren Triche, Jr. 100%
J. Chris Ullo 50%
Wayne Waddell 83%
Thomas Warner 83%
Sharon Weston 50%
Pinkie Carolyn Wilkerson 0%
Cynthia Willard-Lewis 17%
Stephen Windhorst 100%
Diane Winston 100%
Thomas Wright 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top