Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI)

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 100%
LA U.S. House 2 Cedric Richmond Democratic 20%
LA State House 4 Cedric Glover Democratic 17%
LA State House 72 Robby Carter Democratic 19%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 19%
LA State Senate 5 Karen Peterson Democratic 23%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 47%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 88%
LA State Senate 13 Dale Erdey Republican 71%
LA State Senate 14 Yvonne Colomb Democratic 25%
LA State Senate 19 Gary Smith, Jr. Democratic 56%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 94%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 100%
LA State Senate 28 Eric LaFleur Democratic 75%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 31%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 100%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 69%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Tarver, Sr. Democratic 24%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 79%
LA Parish President At-Large Errol Romero 72%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu 27%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 27%
LA Council Member At-Large Kip Holden 21%
LA Mayor President At-Large Sharon Broome Democratic 33%
Ernest Alexander 100%
Rodney Alexander 94%
Glenn Ansardi 46%
Diana Bajoie 21%
Damon Baldone 75%
Robert Barham 90%
Clara Baudoin 19%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 20%
Ronald Bean 89%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 24%
Shirley Bowler 94%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 36%
Emile Bruneau 94%
James Cain 47%
Foster Campbell, Jr. 28%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 69%
Joel Chaisson II 70%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 90%
Carl Crane 100%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 11%
A. Crowe, Jr. 86%
Israel Curtis 8%
N. J. Damico 94%
William Daniel IV 100%
Jay Dardenne, Jr. 80%
Carla Dartez 97%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 90%
Emma Devillier 45%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 50%
John Diez 83%
Jean Doerge 44%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 88%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 75%
Sydnie Mae Durand 81%
Noble Ellington 80%
Rick Farrar 38%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 57%
Cleo Fields 18%
Wilson Fields 22%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 81%
Heulette Fontenot 80%
Mickey Frith 87%
Greg Fruge 94%
Mike Futrell 100%
Richard Gallot, Jr. 34%
Butch Gautreaux 75%
Kyle Mark Green 33%
Elcie Guillory 26%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 67%
Alexander Heaton 53%
Troy Hebert 81%
Francis Heitmeier 26%
Herman Ray Hill 31%
Donald Hines 25%
Ken Hollis 70%
Roy Hopkins 53%
Fred Hoyt 90%
Charles Irvin Hudson 25%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 19%
Nita Hutter 71%
Kay Iles 33%
Paulette Riley Irons 29%
Lydia Jackson 19%
Michael Jackson 27%
Jon Johnson 44%
Bill Jones 65%
Charles Jones 20%
Kay Katz 97%
Donald Kennard 96%
Lelon Kenney 90%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 28%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 100%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 93%
Arthur Lentini 82%
Leonard Lucas, Jr. 17%
Max Malone 100%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 44%
Jay Bowen McCallum 88%
Charles McDonald 88%
Joe McPherson 7%
Thomas McVea 50%
Michael Michot 100%
Billy Montgomery 26%
Willie Mount 30%
Edwin Murray 19%
Ben Nevers, Sr. 31%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 13%
Anthony Richard Perkins 88%
Wilfred Pierre 28%
Gillis Pinac 27%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 100%
Henry Powell 78%
Renee Gill Pratt 13%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 25%
Charles Riddle III 56%
Craig Romero 70%
Joe Salter 69%
Pete Schneider III 100%
Melinda Schwegmann 41%
B.L. Shaw 88%
Jack Smith 88%
Jane Smith 80%
Kenneth Smith 70%
Jennifer Sneed 94%
Victor Stelly 100%
Mike Strain 84%
Patrick Swilling 33%
Gerald Theunissen 70%
Jerry Thomas 74%
Joseph Toomy 93%
Thomas Townsend 28%
Warren Triche, Jr. 75%
Jim Tucker 100%
J. Chris Ullo 70%
Wayne Waddell 84%
Diane Winston 94%
Ernest Wooton 59%
Thomas Wright 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top