Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NARAL Pro-Choice Montana

1999 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
ID State Senate 2 Steve Vick Republican 0%
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 0%
MT State Senate 5 Bob Keenan Republican 0%
MT State Senate 16 Frank Smith Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 44 Fred Thomas Republican 0%
MT State Senate 50 Tom Facey Democratic 100%
Darrel Adams 0%
Joan Andersen 0%
Tom Beck 0%
Al Bishop 0%
Rodney Bitney 0%
John Bohlinger 0%
Sylvia Bookout-Reinicke 10%
Rosalie Buzzas 100%
B. F. Christiaens 0%
Edith Clark 80%
Paul Clark 20%
Vicki Cocchiarella 100%
Mack Cole 0%
William Crismore 0%
Aubyn Curtiss 0%
Richard Dale 0%
Bob Davies 0%
Thomas Dell 10%
Robert DePratu 0%
Steve Doherty 100%
Bill Eggers 100%
E. P. Ekegren 0%
Jon Ellingson 100%
Alvin Ellis, Jr. 0%
Ron Erickson 100%
Stanley Fisher 80%
Eve Franklin 100%
Daniel Clint Fuchs 0%
Steven Gallus 100%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 100%
Kim Gillan 20%
William Glaser 0%
George Golie 90%
Duane Grimes 0%
Lorents Grosfield 0%
Gail Gutsche 100%
Richard Haines 0%
Mike Halligan 100%
Don Hargrove 0%
Donald Hedges 0%
Linda Holden 0%
Ric Holden 0%
Joan Hurdle 100%
Verdell Jackson 0%
Greg Jergeson 0%
Carol Juneau 100%
Dave Kasten 0%
Bob Lawson 0%
Ralph Lenhart 100%
Monica Lindeen 100%
Dale Mahlum 0%
Jeff Mangan 100%
Gay Ann Masolo 0%
Gary Matthews 100%
Matt McCann 10%
Bea McCarthy 0%
Daniel McGee 10%
Joe McKenney 0%
Walter McNutt 0%
Ken Miller 0%
Arnie Mohl 0%
Doug Mood 0%
Linda Nelson 0%
Mark Noennig 0%
Glenn Roush 0%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Jim Shockley 0%
Roger Somerville 0%
Mike Sprague 0%
Robert Story, Jr. 0%
Mike Taylor 0%
William Thomas 0%
Joseph Tropila 20%
Allan Walters 0%
Mignon Waterman 100%
Jack Wells 0%
John Witt 80%
Cindy Younkin 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top