Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: West Virginia AFL-CIO

2003 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
WV U.S. House 3 Evan Jenkins Republican 50%
WV State House 5 David Pethtel Democratic 22%
WV State House 6 William Romine Republican 22%
WV State House 8 Bill Anderson, Jr. Republican 44%
WV State House 10 Frank Deem Republican 0%
WV State House 18 Kelli Sobonya Republican 22%
WV State House 32 Shirley Love Democratic 50%
WV State House 34 Brent Boggs Democratic 44%
WV State House 36 Larry Rowe Democratic 50%
WV State House 40 Tim Armstead Republican 22%
WV State House 43 William Hartman Democratic 11%
WV State House 45 Bill Hamilton Republican 78%
WV State House 48 Richard Iaquinta Democratic 50%
WV State House 50 Mike Caputo Democratic 89%
WV State House 51 Barbara Fleischauer Democratic 89%
WV State House 51 Cindy Frich Republican 33%
WV State House 54 Allen Evans Republican 22%
WV State House 62 John Overington Republican 0%
WV State Senate 3 Donna Boley Republican 0%
WV State Senate 4 Mitchell Carmichael Republican 44%
WV State Senate 5 Robert Plymale Democratic 0%
WV State Senate 13 Bob Beach Democratic 11%
WV State Senate 13 Roman Prezioso, Jr. Democratic 50%
WV State Senate 15 Craig Blair Republican 22%
WV State Senate 15 Charles Trump IV Republican 22%
WV State Senate 16 John Unger II Democratic 100%
WV State Senate 17 Corey Palumbo Democratic 33%
WV Commissioner At-Large Tim Ennis 22%
WV Commissioner At-Large Dale Manuel 78%
WV Commissioner At-Large Harold Michael 11%
WV Commissioner At-Large Scott Varner 11%
WV State Board of Education Thomas Campbell 11%
WV State Board of Education David Perry 50%
Constantino Amores, Jr. 11%
Bob Ashley 33%
Tom Azinger 0%
Billy Bailey, Jr. 50%
J.D. Beane 11%
Larry Border 11%
Edwin Bowman 0%
Bonnie Brown 78%
Dwight Richard Browning 67%
Greg Butcher 78%
Anita Skeens Caldwell 100%
Anna Laura Stewart Calvert 0%
Samuel Cann, Sr. 11%
Ray Canterbury, Jr. 44%
Donald Caruth 11%
H. Truman Chafin 50%
Thomas Coleman, Jr. 86%
Kevin Craig 11%
Gerald Crosier 11%
Joe DeLong 89%
Tracy Dempsey 100%
John Doyle 11%
Walter Duke 89%
Larry Edgell 0%
John Ellem 78%
Karen Facemyer 0%
Larry Faircloth 0%
John Fanning 50%
Joe Ferrell 44%
Daniel Foster 44%
Ronald Fragale 89%
Eustace Frederick 11%
Jesse Guills, Jr. 0%
Mike Hall 0%
Steve Harrison 50%
Barbara Hatfield 75%
Walter Helmick 0%
Nancy Houston 33%
Greg Howard 22%
Lidella Hrutkay 67%
Jon Hunter 100%
Jeff Kessler 0%
Robert Kiss 11%
Kerry Steven Kominar 0%
Earnest Kuhn 67%
Margarette Leach 33%
Otis Leggett 25%
Marshall Long 11%
William Louisos 78%
Virginia Mahan 44%
A. James Manchin 78%
Dale Martin 78%
Brooks McCabe, Jr. 0%
Andy McKenzie 50%
Jerry Mezzatesta 11%
Joseph Minard 0%
Sarah Minear 0%
Jim Morgan 22%
Mike Oliverio II 50%
Brady Paxton 78%
Don Perdue 33%
John Pino 11%
Mary Poling 89%
Bill Proudfoot 11%
Donna Reid Renner 33%
Mike Ross 0%
Robert Schadler 0%
Patti Schoen 33%
William Sharpe, Jr. 0%
Stan Shaver 56%
John Shelton 25%
Jody Guthrie Smirl 11%
Lisa Smith 50%
Herb Snyder 0%
Sharon Spencer 33%
Victor Sprouse 0%
Douglas Stalnaker 11%
W. Richard Staton 11%
William Stemple 11%
Linda Sumner 11%
Sally Matz Susman 78%
Randy Swartzmiller 11%
Robert Tabb 11%
Joe Talbott 33%
Rick Thompson 89%
Ron Thompson, Jr. 22%
Kenneth Tucker 78%
Christopher Wakim 11%
Ronald Walters, Sr. 0%
Barbara Warner 0%
Charles Russell Webb 40%
Carrie Webster 89%
Russell Weeks, Jr. 0%
Randy White 100%
Harry White 44%
L. Gil White 0%
Larry Williams 11%
Bill Wright 56%
Emily Yeager 78%
H. Jack Yost, Jr. 78%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top