Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana National Federation of Independent Business

2006-2007 Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. Senate Sr Bill Cassidy Republican 67%
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 100%
LA U.S. House 2 Cedric Richmond Democratic 40%
LA State House 72 Robby Carter Democratic 25%
LA State Senate 5 Karen Peterson Democratic 14%
LA State Senate 6 Bodi White, Jr. Republican 89%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 38%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 75%
LA State Senate 13 Dale Erdey Republican 100%
LA State Senate 14 Yvonne Colomb Democratic 25%
LA State Senate 15 Regina Barrow Democratic 57%
LA State Senate 18 Eddie Lambert Republican 100%
LA State Senate 19 Gary Smith, Jr. Democratic 71%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 100%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 89%
LA State Senate 28 Eric LaFleur Democratic 63%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 56%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 89%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 33%
LA State Senate 35 James Fannin Republican 67%
LA Parish President At-Large Errol Romero 25%
LA Mayor President At-Large Sharon Broome Democratic 33%
LA Mayor President At-Large Joel Robideaux Republican 88%
Robert Adley 75%
Ernest Alexander 89%
Jody Amedee 78%
Glenn Ansardi 33%
Jeff Arnold 25%
Austin Badon, Jr. 25%
Diana Bajoie 0%
Damon Baldone 67%
Robert Barham 100%
Clara Baudoin 22%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 29%
Gary Beard 100%
Walter Boasso 63%
Shirley Bowler 100%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 13%
Sherri Buffington 88%
Tim Burns 75%
Roy Burrell 13%
James Cain 75%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 50%
Joel Chaisson II 50%
Billy Chandler 50%
Carl Crane 88%
Donald Cravins, Jr. 56%
A. Crowe, Jr. 89%
Israel Curtis 14%
N. J. Damico 44%
William Daniel IV 71%
Carla Dartez 57%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 29%
Jean Doerge 33%
Gordon Dove, Sr. 71%
Hollis Downs 63%
Ann Duplessis 17%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 50%
Sydnie Mae Durand 22%
Noble Ellington 56%
Rick Farrar 38%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 56%
Cleo Fields 17%
Heulette Fontenot 67%
Mickey Frith 44%
Richard Gallot, Jr. 11%
Butch Gautreaux 38%
Nick Gautreaux 50%
Brett Geymann 89%
Cheryl Gray Evans 14%
Hunter Greene 88%
Elcie Guillory 25%
Mickey Guillory 56%
Terrell Harris 29%
Alexander Heaton 33%
Francis Heitmeier 50%
Troy Herbert 33%
Herman Ray Hill 22%
Donald Hines 0%
Ken Hollis 67%
Avon Honey 14%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 25%
Nita Hutter 63%
Lydia Jackson 33%
Michael Jackson 38%
Jalila Jefferson-Bullock 82%
Charles Jones 13%
Kay Katz 89%
Donald Kennard 56%
Lelon Kenney 44%
Charles Kleckley 88%
Robert Kostelka 88%
John LaBruzzo, Jr. 89%
Juan LaFonta 29%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 89%
Arthur Lentini 63%
Max Malone 88%
Percy Marchand 38%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 44%
Charles McDonald 67%
Joe McPherson 22%
Thomas McVea 75%
Michael Michot 86%
Billy Montgomery 44%
Willie Mount 75%
Edwin Murray 33%
Ben Nevers, Sr. 50%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 33%
Wilfred Pierre 22%
Gillis Pinac 33%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 78%
Henry Powell 86%
Michael Powell 100%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 22%
Julie Quinn 71%
Harold Ritchie 38%
Craig Romero 78%
Joe Salter 11%
Tom Schedler, Jr. 75%
Pete Schneider III 89%
Derrick Shepherd 43%
M. J. Smiley, Jr. 89%
Jack Smith 33%
Jane Smith 89%
Kenneth Smith 67%
Karen St Germain 50%
Charmaine Stiaes 38%
Mike Strain 89%
Gerald Theunissen 78%
Joseph Toomy 63%
Thomas Townsend 33%
Donald Trahan 89%
Warren Triche, Jr. 29%
Jim Tucker 88%
J. Chris Ullo 56%
Wayne Waddell 89%
Monica Walker 13%
Diane Winston 100%
Ernest Wooton 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top