Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Wilderness Coalition

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Charles Pickering, Jr. 16%
Joe Pitts 16%
Todd Platts 33%
Earl Pomeroy 83%
Jon Porter, Sr. 0%
Deborah Pryce 16%
Mark Pryor 83%
Adam Putnam 0%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 100%
James Ramstad 83%
Charlie Rangel 100%
Ralph Regula 0%
Denny Rehberg 0%
Harry Reid 100%
Richard Renzi 0%
Silvestre Reyes 16%
Thomas Reynolds 0%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Mike Rogers 0%
Mike Ross 33%
Steve Rothman 83%
John Salazar 100%
Ken Salazar 100%
Loretta Sanchez 100%
Jim Saxton 83%
Jean Schmidt 0%
Allyson Schwartz 100%
John Shadegg 0%
Christopher Shays 100%
Ike Skelton 50%
Gordon Smith 16%
Olympia Snowe 33%
Vic Snyder 83%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 16%
John Spratt, Jr. 100%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Ted Stevens 0%
Bart Stupak 83%
John Sullivan 0%
John Sununu 16%
Tom Tancredo 0%
John Tanner 66%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
Gene Taylor 50%
Lee Terry 16%
Craig Thomas 0%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 50%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
Mark Udall 100%
David Vitter 0%
George Voinovich 16%
James Walsh 33%
Zach Wamp 16%
John Warner 0%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 100%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 0%
Gerald Weller 0%
Lynn Westmoreland 0%
Robert Wexler 100%
Ed Whitfield 16%
Heather Wilson 0%
Frank Wolf 16%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Albert Wynn 83%
Bill Young 16%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top