Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Research Institute for Economic Development

2010 Lifetime Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
OK U.S. House 5 Steve Russell Republican 67%
OK Lieutenant Governor Todd Lamb Republican 94%
OK State House 6 Chuck Hoskin Democratic 42%
OK State House 11 Earl Sears Republican 94%
OK State House 14 George Faught Republican 75%
OK State House 15 Ed Cannaday Democratic 40%
OK State House 17 Brian Renegar Democratic 26%
OK State House 24 Steve Kouplen Democratic 31%
OK State House 25 Todd Thomsen Republican 94%
OK State House 31 Jason Murphey Republican 35%
OK State House 34 Cory Williams Democratic 33%
OK State House 41 John Enns Republican 90%
OK State House 47 Leslie Osborn Republican 93%
OK State House 48 Pat Ownbey Republican 93%
OK State House 52 Charles Ortega Republican 84%
OK State House 55 Todd Russ Republican 58%
OK State House 57 Harold Wright Republican 91%
OK State House 59 Mike Sanders Republican 91%
OK State House 74 Dale Derby Republican 82%
OK State House 75 Dan Kirby Republican 100%
OK State House 77 Eric Proctor Democratic 53%
OK State House 79 Weldon Watson Republican 100%
OK State House 80 Mike Ritze Republican 25%
OK State House 83 Randy McDaniel Republican 94%
OK State House 94 Scott Inman Democratic 59%
OK State House 96 Lewis Moore Republican 88%
OK State Senate 10 Eddie Fields Republican 85%
OK State Senate 16 John Sparks Democratic 49%
OK State Senate 24 Anthony Sykes Republican 73%
OK State Senate 27 Bryce Marlatt Republican 90%
OK State Senate 32 Randy Bass Democratic 63%
OK State Senate 35 Gary Stanislawski Republican 93%
OK State Senate 36 Bill Brown Republican 79%
OK State Senate 37 Dan Newberry Republican 82%
OK State Senate 38 Mike Schulz Republican 83%
OK State Senate 48 Anastasia Pittman Democratic 52%
OK Commissioner 2 Mike Thompson 91%
OK Commissioner 3 Ron Peters 94%
OK Treasurer Ken Miller Republican 94%
Tom Adelson 50%
Cliff Aldridge 84%
Patrick Anderson 83%
Don Armes 89%
John Auffet 56%
Dennis Bailey 44%
Roger Ballenger 37%
Gary Banz 86%
Don Barrington 90%
Chris Benge 90%
Lisa Billy 82%
Brian Bingman 98%
Gus Blackwell 81%
Cliff Branan 96%
Neil Brannon 53%
Randy Brogdon 63%
Mike Brown 41%
Samson Buck 29%
Sean Burrage 59%
John Wayne Carey 62%
Mike Christian 57%
Harry Coates, Jr. 83%
Glenn Coffee 93%
Wallace Collins 38%
Ann Coody 92%
Marian Cooksey 84%
Kenneth Corn 58%
Doug Cox 85%
Brian Crain 96%
Johnnie Crutchfield 64%
David Dank 92%
Lee Denney 94%
Dale DeWitt 87%
Joe Dorman 65%
Rex Duncan 60%
Mary Easley 54%
Judy Eason McIntyre 38%
Jerry Ellis 33%
John Ford 90%
Earl Garrison 58%
Larry Glenn 46%
Jay Paul Gumm 68%
Jim Halligan 89%
Rebecca Hamilton 23%
Terry Harrison, Jr. 45%
Jeff Hickman 88%
Wes Hilliard 52%
Corey Holland 79%
Tom Ivester 51%
Mike Jackson 94%
Shane Jett 88%
Constance Johnson 44%
Dennis Johnson 76%
Mike Johnson 92%
Clark Jolley 97%
Tad Jones 91%
Fred Jordan 85%
Charles Joyner 84%
Ron Justice 92%
Sally Kern 58%
Charles Key 51%
Ryan Dean Kiesel 43%
Lucky Lamons 82%
Charlie Laster 63%
Debbe Leftwich 60%
Richard Lerblance 51%
Guy Liebmann 94%
Ken Luttrell 45%
Scott Martin 97%
Steve Martin 91%
Mike Mazzei 89%
Al McAffrey 43%
Mark McCullough 95%
Jeannie McDaniel 57%
Skye McNiel 89%
Jerry McPeak 41%
Danny Morgan 64%
Richard Morrissette 24%
David Myers 90%
Bill Nations 54%
Jason Nelson 92%
Jonathan Nichols 87%
Susan Paddack 74%
Pam Peterson 82%
R. C. Pruett 68%
Jim Reynolds 80%
Mike Reynolds 40%
Andrew Rice 47%
Phil Richardson 92%
Paul Roan 56%
Wade Rousselot 56%
Colby Schwartz 93%
Seneca Scott 32%
TW Shannon 97%
Mike Shelton 25%
Ben Sherrer 48%
Jerry Shoemake 58%
Jabar Shumate 37%
Glen Bud Smithson 57%
Kris Steele 95%
Dan Sullivan 98%
Joe Loyd Sweeden 44%
Randy Terrill 75%
Sue Tibbs 89%
John Trebilcock 77%
Purcy Walker 69%
Paul Wesselhoft 51%
Jim Wilson 36%
John Wright 71%
Charles Wyrick 52%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top