Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Research Institute for Economic Development

2003 Positions on Pro-Business Policy

State Office District Name Party Rating
NA Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency E. Scott Pruitt Republican 94
OK State House 82 Kevin Calvey Republican 82
OK Commissioner 3 Ron Peters 85
Dennis Adkins 76
Cliff Aldridge 96
Don Armes 84
Jari Askins 68
Thad Balkman 80
Chris Benge 90
Deborah Kay Blackburn 51
Gus Blackwell 79
David Braddock 67
Cliff Branan 100
Neil Brannon 58
Randy Brogdon 86
Bernest Cain, Jr. 56
Gilmer Neely Capps 56
John Wayne Carey 72
Lance Cargill 80
Bill Case 94
Harry Coates, Jr. 98
Glenn Coffee 87
Kenneth Corn 58
James Covey 79
Johnnie Crutchfield 57
Odilia Dank 78
Abe Deutschendorf 72
Dale DeWitt 90
Joe Dorman 71
Mary Easley 65
Joe Eddins 66
Jerry Ellis 63
Ted Fisher 82
Darrell Gilbert 55
Jay Paul Gumm 75
Rebecca Hamilton 44
J. Berry Harrison 48
Terry Harrison, Jr. 64
Chris Hastings 79
Todd Hiett 100
Calvin Jackson Hobson III 58
Terry Ingmire 86
Mike Johnson 100
Tad Jones 93
Robert Mark Kerr 80
Lucky Lamons 64
Owen Laughlin 96
Daisy Lawler 63
Richard Lerblance 72
Al Lindley 43
Mark Liotta 88
Raymond Gene McCarter 72
Doug Miller 81
Ray Miller 53
Danny Morgan 72
Fred Samuel Morgan 100
Mike Morgan 37
David Myers 96
John Nance 74
Bill Nations 74
Jim Newport 82
Jonathan Nichols 92
Fred Perry 86
Ron Peterson 93
Greg Piatt 93
Bob Plunk 74
Jeff Rabon 58
Jim Reynolds 100
Mike Reynolds 90
Nancy Riley 96
Paul Roan 52
Curt Roggow 95
Franklin David Shurden 73
John Smaligo, Jr. 86
Glen Bud Smithson 60
Barbara Annette Staggs 71
Kris Steele 93
Joe Loyd Sweeden 60
Stratton Taylor 35
Sue Tibbs 81
Opio Toure 49
John Trebilcock 79
Dale Turner 74
Purcy Walker 54
Kathleen Wilcoxson 84
James Williamson 97
Mike Wilt 83
Susan Winchester 98
John Wright 87
Ray Young 77

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top