Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Alaska Conservation Voters

2001-2002 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
AK U.S. Senate Sr Lisa Murkowski Republican 29%
AK State House 29 Mike Chenault Republican 14%
AK State Senate A Pete Kelly Republican 21%
AK State Senate B John Coghill, Jr. Republican 21%
AK State Senate M Kevin Meyer Republican 21%
AK State Senate P Gary Stevens Republican 7%
AK State Senate S Lyman Hoffman Democratic 57%
AK State Senate T Donald Olson Democratic 50%
AK Mayor At-Large Ethan Berkowitz Democratic 79%
AK Mayor At-Large Reggie Joule 64%
AK Assembly Member 3 Eric Croft No Party Affiliation 86%
AK Assembly Member At-Large Eric Croft No Party Affiliation 86%
AK Assembly Member Seat H John Davies Democratic 93%
Alan Austerman 21%
Con Bunde 21%
Sharon Cissna 86%
John Cowdery 14%
Harry Crawford, Jr. 71%
Bettye Davis 64%
Dave Donley 21%
Fred Dyson 14%
Johnny Ellis 100%
Kim Elton 93%
Bud Fate 14%
Richard Foster 14%
Joseph Green 36%
Lyda Green 14%
Gretchen Guess 71%
Andrew Halcro 36%
Rick Halford 21%
John Harris 21%
Joe Hayes, Jr. 50%
Bill Hudson 21%
Jeannette James 21%
Beth Kerttula 100%
Vic Kohring 14%
Albert Kookesh 50%
Pete Kott 21%
Ken Lancaster 21%
Loren Leman 21%
Georgianna Lincoln 64%
Beverly Masek 29%
Lesil McGuire 14%
Carl Morgan, Jr. 21%
Carl Moses 36%
Eldon Mulder 21%
Mary Nelson 79%
Scott Ogan 7%
Randy Phillips 21%
Brian Porter 14%
Norman Rokeberg 14%
Drew Scalzi 29%
Ben Stevens 11%
Robin Taylor 14%
Gene Therriault 29%
John Torgerson 21%
Jerry Ward 21%
Jim Whitaker 21%
Gary Wilken 21%
William Williams 21%
Peggy Wilson 14%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top